► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Neo-Feudalism’

Democrats give up on Independent Voters

by Rodan ( 37 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Election 2008, Elections 2010, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives, Republican Party at July 10th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

The progressive controlled Democratic party was swept into power in 2006 and 2008 thanks to the help of Independent voters. They deceived these voters by focusing on bashing Bush and Conservatives. It worked because they didn’t fight back. Now that the Totalitarian 3rd World nature of Obama has been revealed, Independent voters have turned on the Democratic party and are prepared to vote in the GOP. The Democratic party’s own polls show they are in danger because of this. Their strategy is now to move Left and turn out their base.

Of all the problems Democrats face this fall, none may be more challenging than trying to win back the support of independent voters.

President Obama has been going backward with independents for more than a year, and the Democrats stand to suffer the effects in the November elections. The Gallup organization reported this week that just 38 percent of independents now approve of the job Obama is doing, the lowest point in his presidency and down from 56 percent a year ago.

Top Democratic strategists are gloomy enough about the prospect of turning those voters around quickly that they believe the more important priority for the next four months is to maximize turnout among the new voters who backed Obama in 2008. Those new voters may be receptive to partisan appeals. Whether that will help with independents is another question.

Read the rest: Democrats battle independents’ weakening support of Obama and Congress

The Progressives are banking on a losing strategy. They believe this nation is really far Left. Independents see the Totalitarian nature of the Progressive Movement and reject it. It is fundamentally opposed to the American concept of Individualism and promotes Neo-Feudalism. As Iron Fist says “Americans Don’t serf”!

► Hot Links

Let them eat ketchup

by Speranza ( 95 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Politics, Progressives at May 28th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Yes the senior Senator from Massachusetts (what has he ever done by the way as a Senator?) – who by the way served in Vietnam -  thinks that  the poor fools who buy his wife’s ketchup really do not understand that we are in a recovery right now and that the continuing and growing unemployment is irrational fear  and that we are not seeing the “big picture”. A scary thought is how close that fool actually came to being president along with John Edwards as vice president.

hat tip -loppyd of Spitfire Murphy

by Howie Carr

Let them eat ketchup.

That in essence is what Liveshot Kerry recommends as his prescription for the little people suffering in the so-called economic “recovery.” That ketchup line, from an anonymous Internet poster yesterday, perfectly captures Kerry’s breathtaking smugness. As he intimated this week in D.C., the hoi polloi just don’t understand his greatness, nor that of his fellow national Democrats, from Barack Obama on down.

These all-time lows for Barack and the Congressional Democrats in various national polls -  John Kerry knows what’s happening.

“I think there’s a comprehension gap,” he explained to a breakfast of Beltway bumkissers.

Comprehension gap. In other words, you’re not smart enough to understand how wonderful he and the rest of his Democrat pals are.

In the case of the Massachusetts electorate, he may well be correct about this comprehension gap. After all, he’s been elected five times to the U.S. Senate – how much more do you need to know about the cluelessness of the voters in this state?

Comprehension – a four-syllable word. How Liveshot is that? Is this comprehension gap anything like the media in 2008 describing Bush’s 5.5 percent unemployment rate as a precursor of the next Great Depression? But now with the unemployment rate under Obama at 9.9 percent, we are told by the exact same media that it’s the “new normal,” a lagging indicator of the alleged recovery, praise Barack.

[..]

“We’ve come back,” Kerry said, perhaps referring to gigolos whose billionaire second wives live off the trust funds of their first husbands. Remember, this guy doesn’t only talk like Thurston Howell III, he lives like him – off other people’s money.

Read the rest: John Kerry defies common wisdom

► Hot Links

Progressives policies lead to Serfdom

by Rodan ( 145 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis at May 24th, 2010 - 1:30 pm

I have often argued that the ultimate goal of the Tranzi Totalitarian Progressives is to establish a Neo-Feudal system. This is the reason they hype climate change. It’s so regular people give up their standards of living while the global elites continue to have big houses, good cars, private jets and yachts. Their global economic policies also are a step in this process. Progressives seek to marry big business with government and prevent competition through high taxes and regulations. This creates economic elites who live great, while the majority of people are dependent on the government for survival. Just like Serfs who were dependent on their feudal lords. This is the vision of Progressivism.

According to Friedrich von Hayek, the development of welfare socialism after World War II undermined freedom and would lead western democracies inexorably to some form of state-run serfdom. 

Hayek had the sign and the destination right but was entirely wrong about the mechanism.  Unregulated finance, the ideology of unfettered free markets, and state capture by corporate interests are what ended up undermining democracy both in North America and in Europe.  All industrialized countries are at risk, but it’s the eurozone – with its vulnerable structures – that points most clearly to our potentially unpleasant collective futures.

As a result of the continuing euro crisis, European Central Bank (ECB) now finds itself buying up the debt of all the weaker eurozone governments, making it the – perhaps unwittingly – feudal boss of Europe.  In the coming years, it will be the ECB and the European Union who dictate policy.  The policy elite who run these structures – along with their allies in the private sector – are the new overlords.

We can argue about who exactly are the peasants, the vassals, and the lords under this model – and what services exactly will end up being exchanged.  But there is no question we are seeing a sea change in the post-war system of property, power, and prosperity across Western Europe, just as Hayek feared.  An overwhelming debt burden will bring down even the proudest people.

Read the rest: The Road To Economic Serfdom

Progressives have brainwashed billions of people around the world for the last 150 years with the concept of Social Justice. In reality, this is just a means to get people dependent on government and accept their inferior status. The elites will live well while the rest of us struggle to get by.

► Hot Links

The Progressives and their Wall Street reform is Crony Capitalism

by Rodan ( 102 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at May 20th, 2010 - 11:00 am

The regime of Barack Hussein Obama would have you believe that they care about the common American. He demagogues banks and Wall Street for political gain. The reality is that Obama and his regime are joined at the hip with Wall Street. Obama’s biggest supporters during the 2008 elections were Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs and investors like George Soros and Warren Buffet. His populist rhetoric is all an act and his Wall Street reform bill doesn’t help the average American. In fact it hurts us by making us liable to perpetually bail out Wall Street firms. This is crony capitalism and Americans need to see through this deception.

Democrats are nervous. Really nervous. They would like nothing more than to turn the page on their health care takeover, taxpayer-funded bailouts, reckless spending, and exploding debt. In the face of fierce political headwinds, the party running Washington is making an effort to advance its ideology at all costs.

Financial regulatory reform, the thinking goes, provides Democrats an issue where the politics finally align with the Left’s policy preferences. Republicans, they believe, can be walked into a convenient political trap by opposing what Democrats call “Wall Street reform.” President Obama has mastered the art of bank populism, premised on class warfare, by tapping into powerful emotions of envy, anger, and fear.

From an ideological perspective, big government can combine with big business to advance a more progressivist society. For self-described “progressives,” the agenda is straightforward: expand government; co-opt big business; direct the capital markets from Washington to pursue “social justice.” Think Fannie and Freddie by much higher orders of magnitude.

Read the Rest: Wall Street “Reform” Just More Crony Capitalism

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) is correct about what is occurring here. Big Business and Big Government go hand in hand. Many corporations like GE are Progressive and support the goals of the Regime. They benefit from government favors which gives them an advantage over small and medium businesses. This results in Americans not being able to pursue their dreams, lack of economic innovation and standard of living stagnation. The end result is Neo-Feudal system and a permanent class structure. This is the goal of Totalitarian Progressives and this Wall Street Reform Bill is just another step in that direction.

► Hot Links

James Cameron compares Global Warming to WWII

by Rodan ( 110 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis at April 23rd, 2010 - 9:00 am

The Progressive myth of Global Warming, which many real scientists and our own Snork have debunked, continues to be pushed. The latest one is that AGW is a threat as big as WW2. The Tranzi who said this was director James Cameron. On a panel that included great scientific minds like Actress Sigourney Weaver, Totalitarian Progressive Tom Friedman and Compassionate Conservative Joe Scarborough, he compares this fantasy to WW II.

Academy Award-winning Director James Cameron said that climate change is “as great as the threat” the United States faced in World War II. His comments were made during a panel discussion about environmental policy on Capitol Hill with columnist Tom Friedman of the New York Times, actress Sigourney Weaver, and MSNBC host Joe Scarborough.  

“I spoke to leaders today that said we can’t use the term climate change,” Cameron said on Apr. 15. “It’s death. It’ll kill the bill. It’ll be still-born, strangle it in its crib by calling it, associating it with climate change. I say, ‘We have to wake up. We have to wake up and call it what it is.’”

Read it here: ‘Avatar’ Director James Cameron: Climate Change as Great as Any Threat Since World War II
With the Global Warming lie exposed as a fraud, the Tranzis are getting desperate. James Cameron’s comparing it to WW II is both a ridiculous and insulting. This shows the extent the Neo-Feudal Left will go to promote this farce and scare people.

► Hot Links

Progressive Fiscal Irresponsibility

by Rodan ( 149 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis at April 19th, 2010 - 8:30 am

The Progressive regime of Barack Hussein Obama is on track to have a deficit of 1.5 trillion. In his first 2 years he has added 3 Trillion to our debt. Obama has not proposed any way out of this fiscal mess we are in. He is gathering a deficit reduction committee than will in all likely-hood recommend a VAT. Make no mistake about it, Obama used the economic crisis as a pretext for massive spending. He knows full well tax rates need to be raised to cover this new spending and that has been the plan all along.


(Picture Hat Tip: The People’s Cube)

We are going to pile up another $3 trillion in national debt in just the first two years of the Obama administration. If the annual deficit should sink below $1.5 trillion, it will be called fiscal sobriety.

Why, when we owe $12 trillion, would the Obama administration set out budgets that will ensure our collective debt climbs to $20 trillion? Why are we borrowing more money, when Medicare, Social Security, the Postal Service, Amtrak, etc. are all insolvent as it is?

What is the logic behind something so clearly unhinged?

Read the rest: How Could We Be So Stupid? Let Us Count the Ways

Victor David Hanson as a historian knows something is not right here. It’s insane to spend at the levels Obama is, economic crisis or not. What caused the crisis was Americans over leveraged on debt. Why go into more debt as a nation? It’s all a pretext to expand governmnet and make people dependent on it. It’s a plan to create a Totalitarian Progressive Neo-Feudal system.

(Hat Tip: Pajamas Media)

► Hot Links

Cap-N-Trade Bill on its way

by Rodan ( 92 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Liberal Fascism, Republican Party, Tranzis at April 16th, 2010 - 9:00 am

The Trani Progressive concept of Cap and Tax is on its way. Thanks to the assistance of Compassionate Conservative Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the bill is et to be introduced April 26th.  Unlike the Eugenics based Obamacare, this has the support of Elitist Republicans and will all likely pass.

WASHINGTON, April 15 (Reuters) – A long-awaited compromise bill to reduce U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases blamed for global warming will be unveiled by a group of senators on April 26, sources said on Thursday.

The legislative language to be sketched out in 11 days, according to government and environmental sources, is being drafted by Democratic Senator John Kerry, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and independent Senator Joseph Lieberman.

Backers of the environmental bill hope the unveiling will pave the way for the full Senate to debate and pass a measure in June or July if the compromise attracts enough support from a group of moderate Republicans and Democrats.

Read the rest: US Senate climate bill to be unveiled

This shows us why primaries are important. If the Republicans had stayed united on this, they can filibuster. However since the elite of the GOP is Progressive, they will cooperate. Unlike Obamacare, the public is not getting riled up about this bill. Make no mistake about it, Cap and Tarde is about control. The government will determine how mush energy is used and will make it more expensive. This is Neo-Feudalism and shame on the Republican traitors like Lindsey Graham who are enabling this Tranzi scheme.

(Hat Tip: Kirly)

► Hot Links

Green Energy from Arabia

by snork ( 111 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Liberal Fascism, Middle East, Progressives, Technology at April 15th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

Some ideas are dumb, and some are dumber. This goes above and beyond and into the category of dumbest.

The Club of Rome, the Malthusian communists who want all of you “extra humans” to die,  have a massive new green jobs program. For the Arabs. Seriously. It’s called Desertec.

Desertec is a concept for making use of solar energy and wind energy in the deserts in North Africa and Middle East proposed by the Desertec Foundation. This concept will be implemented by the consortium DII GmbH/ Desertec Industrial Initiative formed by a group of European companies and the Desertec Foundation. The Desertec concept was initiated under the auspices of the Club of Rome and the German Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (TREC).

Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful. Double the cost of electricity for Europeans, and in exchange, they’re hooked on energy from the same countries producing oil right now. Is this genius, or what?

Hilariously, in the wiki article, under criticisms, we start out with this brilliant observation:

Centralized solar energy plants and transmission lines may become a target of terrorist attacks.

Duh? And they go on to point out another chapter of Captain Obvious:

Some experts fear that generating so much of the electricity consumed in Europe in Africa would create a political dependency on North African countries which have corruption and a lack of cross-border coordination.

No way!

There is a fear that due to the large scale cooperation necessary between the EU and the north African nations the project may be delayed due to diplomatic and bureaucratic red tape and other factors such as expropriation of assets, license agreement reneging and corruption.

Not to mention that there’s no way they can ever settle this without first settling the Palestinian issue. Moving from the geopolitical to the technical, we have this lulu:

Transmitting energy over long distances has been criticized, with questions raised over the cost of cabling compared to energy generation, and over electricity losses. Investment may also be required within Europe in a ‘supergrid’. In response, one proposal is to cascade power between neighbouring states so that states draw on the power generation of neighbouring states rather than from distant desert sites.

I won’t go into why, but that is dumb on wheels. I’m shaking my head in disbelief that even wiki could print something that dumb (any EEs here, I’m sure are ROFLing in disbelief at that one).

This is your future with your intellectual betters making decisions that are good for you. Grab your ankles, and check your brain at the door.

► Hot Links

545 vs. 300 million

by savage ( 152 Comments › )
Filed under Politics at April 15th, 2010 - 3:30 pm

This is an actual column written by Charlie Reese of the Orlando Sentinel from 1995, updated to the present day. I got this in an email and I think it is worth posting.
**********************************
545 PEOPLE–By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them..

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don’t propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don’t have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don’t write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don’t set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don’t control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator’s responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits….. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? Nancy Pelosi. She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red ..

If the Army & Marines are in IRAQ, it’s because they want them in IRAQ

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power..

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.

Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.
***************************************************

Snopes says it is true…

► Hot Links

The Great Political War Obama Never Expected

by Speranza ( 94 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Health Care, Progressives at April 11th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Hubris meet nemesis. We need to continue fighting and adapt the slogan – starve, replace and repeal.

by J. Robert Smith

Man proposes and God disposes. A big part of the trouble for Barack Obama and all those crackerjack leftwing strategists and the brigades of Alinsky thugketeers is that they’ve never gotten the hang of the second part of that old axiom. For the left, God disposes of nothing, because God is, well, nothing more than an opiate. The rest of us who believe in God know otherwise. History is strewn with fine examples of man’s grand designs coming athwart something — anything — that makes those designs not worth the paper they’re drawn on. By chance, does anyone know what happened to the British North American Empire?

So it is today in the United States of America. We have a president and a party (infested with a cabal of heathen leftists) whose grand design is to bloat the state and, hence, their own power. But the left’s smart plans have come athwart something, that something being the freedom-loving intransigence of God-fearing conservatives and many other Americans (God-fearing as well). What Barack Obama and the left have gotten is what they never expected: a political war — perhaps one on an epic scale that will bring down the House of FDR.

Providence is no friend of hubris, and there is much foul hubris in the left’s maximum leader, Barack Obama, and perhaps as much in his minions. Whether the Tower of Obama meets the same fate as the Tower of Babel depends on the outcome of the political war underway. Expect the war to be protracted and a close-run thing, for when push comes to shove, Mr. Obama and the left are choosing to govern in semi-caudillo fashion — that is, contrary to the will of the people. Utopia is being foisted on Americans for their own good.

The cocky President Obama; his chief henchman, the bullying locker-room nudist, Rahm Emanuel; and his Rasputin, a Chicago political machine consigliere named Axelrod, all misinterpreted and overestimated the results of the Democrats’ ascendancy in 2006 and 2008. They were buoyed by the analyses of shifts in the electorate penned by liberal pundits. America, the left believed, was ripe for a sharp turn left.

But almost from the get-go, Americans wanted no decisive swing leftward. Opposition to Mr. Obama’s big-government hash was nearly instantaneous. Conservatives were in the vanguard of fighting the revolutionary — perhaps more accurately, reactionary — march of the left toward heretofore unheard-of liberty-depriving dominance.

[...]

But ultimately, this war will not be won in the trenches. Victory depends on a breakout. The strategy is for freedom-lovers to hold the line until November. Then sober-minded voters, moving en masse to the polls, will elect a conservative majority via the Republican Party to the U.S. House or Senate, or both. Congressional majorities will then commence a new phase of the war, a war of maneuver aimed at outflanking Mr. Obama and the left.

If triumphant — if voters depose Madame Pelosi, the droll Harry Reid, and their forces — Republicans, with new conservative backbone and muscle, can begin Operation Starve, Replace, and Repeal. Starve Mr. Obama’s wretched government health care scheme of funding. Repeal it when a Republican president assumes office in 2013. And replace the Obama monstrosity with market-oriented, consumer-empowering reforms shortly thereafter. And do the same with any other legislation that the pale reds pushed through in their brief but disruptive tenure.

Read the rest here: The Great Political War Obama Never Expected

► Hot Links

The Progressive Tax Code is about Control

by Rodan ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under Communism, Economy, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at April 6th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Our current tax code is outdated and needs reform. This has not occurred because Progressives in both the Republican and Democratic Parties love the concept of manipulation. Our code is called the Progressive Tax Code for a reason. It was designed by the Progressive Movement and implemented by Radical Totalitarian Progressive Woodrow Wilson.

The Wilsonian Legacy has harmed America in many ways. Our foreign policy is based on the naive notion of spreading Democracy, not using American power to pursue our National interests. The concept of the government manipulating economic behavior through the tax code is another legacy which has done much to reduce Americans’ economic freedom. But, that is the goal of the Progressive tax code!

Congratulations! This is your last week working for the man — at least for this year. The Tax Foundation calculates that Tax Freedom Day for 2010 is April 9, which means that by Friday, Americans will have spent nearly 100 days working just to pay their taxes. If Democrats have their way, Tax Freedom Day will keep getting later and later.

 Hold that thought. Imagine for a moment that Tax Freedom Day was Dec. 31. In other words, picture working 365 days a year for the government. Now, the government would “give” you a place to sleep, food to eat and clothes to wear, but all your income would really be Washington’s income to allocate as it saw fit. Some romantics might call this sort of arrangement “socialism” or “communism.” But another perfectly good word for it is “slavery” or, if you prefer, involuntary servitude.

Read the rest: How much taxation is enough?

Jonah Goldberg nails it in his column. The amount of taxes dictates the amount of control the governmnet has over the individual. The more in taxes, the more control the elites have. That was one of the goals of Obamacare (the other being Eugenics), to redistribute wealth as the government seems fit. What is needed to alleviate this is not tax cuts, but a total tax overhaul and a new code that promotes investments and entrepreneurship. This is a Neo-Feudalist means to control on the part of the Progressives and Americans are not having it. Our nation is a rejection of Feudalism and as we have rejected it in the past, the future will be no different!

Update: The Regime of Barack Hussein Obama has suffered a blow in its attempt to control the Internet.

(Hat Tip: vapig)

► Hot Links

The Tea Partiers are the Mainstream

by Rodan ( 104 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Elections, Elections 2010, Polls, Progressives, Republican Party, Tea Parties at April 5th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

The Totalitarian Progressive Movement has smeared the Tea Party Movement over and over again. They attack them as Fascists, Nazis, Racists and Christian extremists. However, this is clearly far from reality. A new survey by Gallup shows exactly what I have observed, the Tea Party Movement is mainstream America. These are average Americans who are tired of the elitesin both parties imposing their views on the public. They are sick of the Democrats with their Neo-Feudalist Ideology of elitist control and their transnationalist, One World foreign policy. They are also tired of the Republicans lying by claiming they are Conservatives when the elites of the party are Neo-Wilsonian Progressives who believe in Big Government and wars to impose Democracy in the Middle East. The Tea Partiers want their country back from the Elites and are a powerful voice.

PRINCETON, NJ — Tea Party supporters skew right politically; but demographically, they are generally representative of the public at large. That’s the finding of a USA Today/Gallup poll conducted March 26-28, in which 28% of U.S. adults call themselves supporters of the Tea Party movement.

Affiliation With Tea Party Movement

Read the rest: Tea Partiers Are Fairly Mainstream in Their Demographics

Americans are tired of Academics and their discredited economic and foreign policy theories. We want a government that represents the true will of the people. We will achieve this goal and the elites of the Republican and Democratic Party will be footnotes in history.

Update: Here’s the crowd reaction towards Obama as he throws the 1st pitch.

► Hot Links

Wyle E. Obama, Genius-In-Chief

by snork ( 122 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Technology at April 4th, 2010 - 10:30 am

From a speech in North Carolina on April 2, 2010. “Bob” is the manager of the plant that he’s speaking at, that makes some sort of polymeric battery insulators. Spaketh the GIF:

So it is a huge need for us to increase our fuel efficiency on cars now.  And that’s why one of the things that I did last year — it’s actually taking effect this week — is to raise a national fuel efficiency standard, first time we’ve done it in a very long time.  But, frankly, even with us raising those standards, I think consumers just in terms of their pocketbook interests are going to be even more interested in buying hybrids and electric cars.

So he made the cars use less gas. Last year. No wonder the earth isn’t warming any more. I didn’t even notice that he saved us already.

Two things that we can do that would make a big difference right now:  Number one, we’ve got to make sure that those cars are made here in the United States of America.  And so part of the reason why it’s so important for us to develop the battery technology here is if we’re developing battery technology that helps us leverage more auto production here in the United States.  [...]

[He never gets around to mentionong the second "thing" -ed]

But one thing we need to do is make sure that those cars are made here in the United States.  [Didn't he already say that? - ed] The second thing we need to do is to create the electricity grid, what we’re calling the smart grid, which is — think about it, part of the reason that we can drive our cars is because there’s a gas station every so often.  There are roads.  There are gas stations.  We know how to fuel up our automobiles.  Now, if we want to have everybody getting maximum use out of an electric car or a hybrid car, part of what we have to do is to create a similar distribution mechanism for electricity.  And one of the exciting things about these hybrids is we want to get to the point where you’ve got what’s called a plug-in hybrid, where you essentially have a gas station at your house — called your electric socket.  And you’re going to be able to plug in your car at night.  Some of the energy that was stored in the car can actually go back into the house, and then when you’re ready to go, you can get that energy and use it to drive.

WTF is this guy blathering about? #1, we don’t have any kind of electricity distribution grid right now? That’s news to me. Last time I checked, this computer was running on electricity, and so is my fridge, and I know it’s working because my beer is cold.

Secondly, (and yes, I’m actually going to follow up on this clause), when in the past has the federal government ever created a utility distribution network? They created the TVA and Bonneville and Hoover systems of generators as make-work projects in the 1930s, but never the distribution network to actual point-of-use consumers.

Thirdly, he seems to have swallowed a mouthful of buzzwords and associated snippets of information without any real understanding of what they really are all about. The “Smart Grid” isn’t a grid at all; it’s a completely stand alone system of internet connections to the utility central operator that allows the utilities to do some clever things that might save some money, but really amounts to a form of high-tech rationing. The “Smart Grid” is a topic for a whole post by itself.

But to do all that you need a better electricity grid. [I just explained why that isn't true. -ed] We’ve got kind of a creaky infrastructure when it comes to electricity, and that’s one of the major investments that we want to start making. [Bullshit, Mr. President. - ed] And that, by the way, is an investment that only government, working with the private sector, can help to make. [More bullshit, Mr. President. The utilities should be able to finance all of that if it makes economic sense, using the conventional return on investment form of financing, Mr. President. There's no need for the government to be involved in any of this infrastructure at all. - ed]

That was a great paragraph, aside from being 100% USDA approved grade AAA bullshit.

You’re hearing a lot of talk these days about government, and government is terrible, and bureaucrats, and they’re taking over and all this stuff.  Look, I don’t want government any more than is necessary, [Copious bullshit, Mr. President. -ed] but there are some things that Bob or any CEO can’t invest in.  Bob is not going to build the roads to get to Celgard.  [Neither is the federal government, Mr. President, but it's not without precedent for a private company to actually build its own roads and connections to the interstate highway system). -ed] No company is going to make investments for a public good. [Excuse me, Mother...Mr. President??? And the federal bureaucrats work for free? -ed] None of you would expect a private company to fund our military or our firefighters. [Who TF do you think is paying for them??? -ed] There are just some things that you can’t do on your own, and the private sector is not going to do — it’s not profitable because if Bob was the guy who had to build the road, he’d have a whole bunch of other people driving on that road that weren’t paying for it.  So it’s not a good investment for him.

Oy. I’m sure glad we gots the smartestest Harvard genius in charge. Aren’t you?

Related: President Obama Gives 17-Minute, 2500 Word Answer to Woman Who Says “We Are Overtaxed”

Where do I go to get those 17 minutes back?

Roger Simon has some interesting (and disturbing) comments on the 17-minute ramble:

I know some conservatives think Obama is a socialist or a closet Alinskyite or whatever, but I think the problem is yet more complicated. No matter his ideology, this man is not fit to rule psychologically. Or, more properly, govern — but you know what I mean. He doesn’t have the temperament. He was elected with people knowing almost nothing about him. Despite that the facts are still masked, his history still obscure, we may now know too much, have seen too much. These things just leak out around the edges. They do for all of us, like it or not. And yet, he will be with us until 2012 at least.

Good luck to us.

Indeed.

► Hot Links

Obama to propose Offshore Drilling

by Rodan ( 95 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Climate, Elections 2010, Progressives at March 31st, 2010 - 8:30 am

Barack Hussein Obama finally makes a decision I agree with. He is proposing opening up areas of the Atlantic and Gulf coasts to offshore drilling. Before we celebrate and dance in the streets, remember that the Bush Administration proposed the same thing and it went nowhere. This most likely is a trick on Obama’s part to get Republicans to support his Neo-Feudalistic Cap-N-Trade scam.

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is proposing to open vast expanses of water along the Atlantic coastline, the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the north coast of Alaska to oil and natural gas drilling, much of it for the first time, officials said Tuesday.

The proposal — a compromise that will please oil companies and domestic drilling advocates but anger some residents of affected states and many environmental organizations — would end a longstanding moratorium on oil exploration along the East Coast from the northern tip of Delaware to the central coast of Florida, covering 167 million acres of ocean.

Read the rest: Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time

Make no mistake about this, although it’s a great idea it’s really a trick. Political eunuch, Lindsey Graham (R-SC), is working with Marxist radical, NY Senator Charles Shumer on a Cap-N-Trade Bill. This proposal is a fig leaf so Graham can get some quisling Republican support behind the energy bill. That is the real reason behind this proposal.

The American people will not be fooled by this move on the part of Barack Hussein Obama. He is a snake oil salesman and his act is wearing thin.

► Hot Links

Begging the Question: We Must Decarbonize the Economy Because We Must Decarbonize the Economy

by snork ( 67 Comments › )
Filed under Climate, Economy at March 30th, 2010 - 6:00 am

The policy wonks are getting weirder and weirder. There’s an environmental website at Yale, and a couple of greenies writing what appears to be a blasphemous piece, entitled “Freeing Energy Policy From The Climate Change Debate”. It starts out well enough:

The 20-year effort by environmentalists to establish climate science as the primary basis for far-reaching action to decarbonize the global energy economy today lies in ruins. Backlash in reaction to “Climategate” and recent controversies involving the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s 2007 assessment report are but the latest evidence that such efforts have evidently failed.

While the urge to blame fossil-fuel-funded skeptics for this recent bad turn of events has proven irresistible for most environmental leaders and pundits, forward-looking greens wishing to ascertain what might be salvaged from the wreckage would be well advised to look closer to home. Climate science, even at its most uncontroversial, could never motivate the remaking of the entire global energy economy. Efforts to use climate science to threaten an apocalyptic future should we fail to embrace green proposals, and to characterize present-day natural disasters as terrifying previews of an impending day of reckoning, have only served to undermine the credibility of both climate science and progressive energy policy.

Can’t say that there’s much to disagree with there. They’re just among the first to admit what was obvious to those of us non-cult members all along.

So, why this post? Because as much as they seem to be arguing that climate change and disaster scenarios are not a pressing matter, they don’t want to drop “decarbonization” (a buzzword among policy wonks) as a primary goal.

In the end, there is no avoiding the enormous uncertainties inherent to our understanding of climate change. Whether 350 parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere, or 450 or 550, is the right number in terms of atmospheric stabilization, any prudent strategy to minimize future risks associated with catastrophic climate change involves decarbonizing our economy as rapidly as possible. Stronger evidence of climate change from scientists was never going to drive Americans to demand economically painful limits on carbon emissions or energy use. And uncertainty about climate science will not deter Americans from embracing energy and other policies that they perceive to be in the nation’s economic, national security, and environmental interest. This was the case in 1988 and is still largely the case today.

That, ladies and gents, is what you call a “WTF??” paragraph. Let me see if I can sort this out:

1. There are “enormous uncertainties”, so we don’t have a clue what the relationship between CO2 and climate is.

2. We don’t have a clue what’s going to happen, but

3. “any prudent strategy to minimize future risks associated with catastrophic climate change involves decarbonizing our economy as rapidly as possible”

Dang, right over the shark! No real evidence that there’s going to be anything bad, but we have to do this massive act of self-flagellation “as rapidly as possible”. Not “as rapidly as practical”, or “as rapidly as reasonable”, or “as rapidly as economical”.

We no longer have to engage in economic self-immolation because something bad is going to happen. We just have to do it because we have to do it.

Got that? If you can read the whole thing. It’s a most amazing tapdance.

__________

It seems as if this is a new developing meme/narrative/strategy. Here’s another such piece in the Seattle Times.

Media coverage of India’s looming environmental crisis has been eclipsed by the debate about long-term future impacts of global climate change. The revelation that the Himalayan glaciers are not retreating as rapidly as reported in the Fourth Assessment Report of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been front-page news in India day after day. Readers of these news stories could easily come away with the impression that the immediacy of the environmental crisis has been exaggerated when, in fact, it is not being given sufficient emphasis.

It’s tempting to blame the media for fixating on global warming, but we climate scientists are partly to blame for the misplaced emphasis. Over the past 20 years we have stood by and watched as governmental and nongovernmental organizations that deal with environmental issues became more and more narrowly focused on the long-term impacts of global warming.

Meanwhile, more imminent issues relating to the sustainability of our planet’s life-support system under the pressures of growing human population and the widening gap between rich and poor are not getting the attention they deserve.

See the two-step? Pay no attention to that Climategate thingy over there crashing and burning, because the earth is dying!!! And note in passing the “widening gap between rich and poor” bunk.

The greenies aren’t going to roll over and die and compost. Unfortunately.

They’re going to have to change that to something other than “climatize”. Climate is so 2009.

► Hot Links