► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘NY Times’

Not us, The New York Slimes Squeals, we are your servants, we helped you.

by Guest Post ( 60 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Progressives at March 26th, 2014 - 7:00 am

Gust Blogger: Doriangrey

The German’s invented a very special word, it’s Schadenfreude, it is defined as follows.

noun, often capitalized \ˈshä-dən-ˌfrȯi-də\

: a feeling of enjoyment that comes from seeing or hearing about the troubles of other people

It’s not a pretty word, in fact, it’s a word that describes one of mankind’s lowest and most undesirable characteristic. The problem is, that the human race is an incredible contradiction. It is filled with Angels and Demons living side by side as it were. Some human beings are kind, compassionate, generous, wonderful beings, others are selfish, narcissistic, abusive, psychopaths, most people fall somewhere in-between.

The Christian bible tells us that eventually the meek will inherit the earth, empirical evidence tells us that the meek will end up under the jack boot of the soulless oppressive psychopaths amongst us. It is this dichotomy of realities that produces Schadenfreude. We know that we should not feel pleasure or joy at the misfortunes of others, and then we watch as people like those employed by the New York Times lie their collective asses off, and not only get away with it, but profit from doing so.

NYT reporter calls Obama WH the “greatest enemy of press freedom”

Thus testifies James Risen, the New York Times reporter reviled by the Bush administration for his probes and exposés of highly-classified government efforts to curtail terrorism. Risen may have had his issues with the Bush White House over his scoops and his sources, but they apparently pale in comparison to what he’s experiencing under Bush’s successor. Speaking to a symposium on press freedom, Risen minced no words in describing the threat to journalists from the Barack Obama administration:

New York Times reporter James Risen, who is fighting an order that he testify in the trial of Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA officer accused of leaking information to him, opened the conference earlier by saying the Obama administration is “the greatest enemy of press freedom that we have encountered in at least a generation.” The administration wants to “narrow the field of national security reporting,” Risen said, to “create a path for accepted reporting.” Anyone journalist who exceeds those parameters, Risen said, “will be punished.”

The administration’s aggressive prosecutions have created “a de facto Official Secrets Act,” Risen said, and the media has been “too timid” in responding.

Toobin appeared on a panel that followed, moderated by Times Supreme Court reporter Adam Liptak, who announced that if he weren’t a paragon of journalistic detachment, he’d say “the persecution of James Risen is a scandal.” The attorney Laura Handman noted that the U.S. Department of Justice’s new guidelines for accessing journalists’ records carve out a big space for the government to decide what constitutes “ordinary newsgathering.”

The panel mentioned Risen and Fox journalist James Rosen, who an FBI agent suggested was a “co-conspirator” in another leak investigation.

It wasn’t just that an FBI agent “suggested” that Rosen was a co-conspirator in espionage. It’s that the allegation was presented as part of a probable-cause warrant to conduct surveillance on Rosen — a move that required the approval of Attorney General Eric Holder, who has dodged questions about how that warrant request got approved.

Jeffrey Toobin and Obama administration lawyer Robert Litt tried to justify the war on reporters:

Robert Litt, the administration’s top lawyer for the national intelligence community, agreed with that statement. At the same conference, he likened reporting on national security leaks to drunk driving, arguing that we ban the practice despite the fact that there isn’t always a victim.

“Not every drunk driver causes a fatal accident,” he explained, “but we ban drunk driving because it increases the risk of accidents. In the same way, we classify information because of the risk of harm, even if no harm actually can be shown in the end from any particular disclosure.”

James Risen and the New York Times are utterly and completely mistaken, it is not the Obama Administration that are the greatest enemies of press freedom, it is the mainstream media themselves who are not only the greatest threat to press freedom, but freedom and liberty period. The mainstream media in America were once defined as being the watchdogs of freedom and liberty, as such their very institution was specifically included in the First amendment to the United States Constitutions Bill of Rights.

The problem is, that the Founding Fathers of the United States never even in their worst nightmare ever dreamed that the Fourth Estate would be subverted by individuals dedicated to a political ideology that was diametrical opposed to everything they believed and held sacred. Now, having done everything in their power to pervert the American political system in order to advance their Marxist/Socialist political agenda, and discovering that the monster they unleashed fully intended to eat them as well, the New York Slimes decides to complain about it.

This is where the Schadenfreude come in.

Like 95% of the rest of the Mainstream Media, the New York Times were co-conspirators in bringing the Obama Administration to power. They knowingly and willfully with a full forethought of Malice lied to and deceived American’s with regard to exactly who and what Barack Obama was. They believed that because Barack Obama, like themselves, was a Marxist/Socialist that helping to arrange his ascension to power would result in their desired Marxist Utopia becoming a reality.

Marxists are unique individuals, perhaps King Solomon when writing the Book of Proverbs was having a rare flash of the future, and wrote this as a result. “Though thou shouldest bray a fool in a mortar among wheat with a pestle, yet will not his foolishness depart from him.” It certainly is one of the best descriptions of Marxist/Socialists that have ever been written. Marxism is not a new political ideology, it’s been around since the mid 1800′s. It is not a untried political ideology, it has been tried nearly a hundred times, and every single time, it has produced nearly identical results.

Yet, like the fool referred to in Proverbs 27:22, those Marxists who have never actually lived under a Marxist controlled government, no matter what you show them, teach them, bring to them as incontrovertible evidence, you cannot remove their insanity from them. Invariably, they resort to the same illogical irrational line of defense. “It would have worked, if only the right people had been in charge”. Even Bob Hope, way back in 1940, had these fools pegs for what they are.

Marxism is a political ideology designed by, and exclusively to create a ruling class for psychopaths. In normal human society, the only thing that keeps the average kitchen variety of psychopath from becoming a serial killer, is a healthy dose of self preservation. While the list of serial killers documents those generally accepted to have been serial killers, it leaves out the most prolific serial killers of all time, Joesph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Che Guevara, yea, that’s right, most prolific serial killers in human history, serial killers who clocked and concealed their psychopathic serial killer nature by dressing it up in the garments of Marxist political ideology.

The Devil, Satan, that Old Dragon, Lucifer, the Father of all lies, has no friends, no servants, no relatives, no lovers, no accomplices, no allies. He has only one moral, ethical, religious principal, “The End Justifies the Means”. He is the avatar, the icon, the mold from which every psychopath or sociopath was cast. To him, and every psychopath, sociopath or true Marxist believer, every human being on the face of the planet represent only possible means to an end.

As the New York times now turns in anger, pain and surprise, bleating out the entirely expected and inevitable cry… “Not us, we are your servants, we helped you”. While it might be wrong of us, those of us who are watching, who know the role that the New York Times and 95% of the rest of the Mainstream Media played in “Fundamentally Transforming” America into a Marxist Utopia cannot but help feeling the Schadenfreude…

(Cross Posted @ The Wilderness of Mirrors)

Even the left-wing propaganda rag, The New York Slimes, can’t stomach Obama’s lies.

by Rodan ( 129 Comments › )
Filed under Blogmocracy, Democratic Party, Guest Post, Marxism, Progressives at August 8th, 2013 - 3:00 pm

Guest Blogger: Doriangrey

Nobody was surprised yesterday when conservatives called out Obama on his blatant lie regard the US Federal Government spying on the American people, that was a given. Today’s delicious schadenfreude is brought to you at the expense of millions of brain-dead liberal Marxist Democrats all across America who today are frantically recalibrating their cognitive dissonance to keep their heads from exploding.

NYT: No spying on Americans? Au contraire

posted at 9:21 am on August 8, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

On Tuesday, Barack Obama insisted that the US government isn’t spying on Americans by surveilling the contents of their communications. Less than two days later, the New York Times makes hash of that claim. The NSA, reports Charlie Savage, sifts through the content of “vast amounts” of electronic communications between Americans and people abroad in their search for links to terrorism, and not just the metadata:

The National Security Agency is searching the contents of vast amounts of Americans’ e-mail and text communications into and out of the country, hunting for people who mention information about foreigners under surveillance, according to intelligence officials.

The N.S.A. is not just intercepting the communications of Americans who are in direct contact with foreigners targeted overseas, a practice that government officials have openly acknowledged. It is also casting a far wider net for people who cite information linked to those foreigners, like a little used e-mail address, according to a senior intelligence official.

While it has long been known that the agency conducts extensive computer searches of data it vacuums up overseas, that it is systematically searching — without warrants — through the contents of Americans’ communications that cross the border reveals more about the scale of its secret operations.

Well, it’s not like anyone actually bought that nonsense from Obama on the Tonight Show. Even one of Obama’s former key aides, Van Jones, openly scoffed at the claim that the NSA wasn’t spying on Americans:

“Everybody knows I love this president, but this is ridiculous,” said Jones. “We do have a spying program, and we need to figure out how to balance these out.”

Jones also criticized the Obama administration’s treatment of whistleblowers.

“You are prosecuting more whistleblowers than every American president combined,” said Jones. “You can’t yuck it up and say, well, whistleblowers come on out and we’ll treat you right.”

How does the NSA choose its targets? Generously, at least in regard to cross-border collection:

To conduct the surveillance, the N.S.A. is temporarily copying and then sifting through the contents of what is apparently most e-mails and other text-based communications that cross the border. The senior intelligence official, who, like other former and current government officials, spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic, said the N.S.A. makes a “clone of selected communication links” to gather the communications, but declined to specify details, like the volume of the data that passes through them.

I have absolutely no sympathy or compassion for those who have made “The end justifies the means” their only moral or ethical standard. I opposed and found “The Patriot Act” repugnant when enacted by the Bush Administration. Spying isn’t wrong because it’s being done on the authorization of Barack Insane Obama. It’s wrong because it is a violation of the United States Constitution. It’s wrong because it is what tyrants and despots do, not what free people do to their CITIZENS.

Sadly, that vast majority of the liberal left are those for whom the ideology that “The end justifies the means” is their only moral or ethical standard. They will give their full and unrestricted approval to anything that their party does, yet would vehemently decry the exact same practices or policies if done by the opposition. They have absolutely no moral or ethical stands beyond what they perceive as winning.

The only reason that the New York Slime’s or Van Jones are making any effort to correct Barack Insane Obama, is that they know that anything they give blanket approval over that Obama does, when the Republicans reclaim the Whitehouse, will be fair game for the Republicans to employ by their own moral and ethical standards.

Neither the New York Slime’s nor Van Jones are suggesting that their is anything wrong with the federal government spying on American’s, they are just carefully hedging their bet’s so that when a Republican Administration is voted in, they will not be trapped into claiming that spying isn’t as Whoopie Goldberg would say, spying spying.

(Cross Posted @ The Wilderness of Mirrors)

Comedy Gold: David Brooks claims that Obama is fiscally responsible!

by Rodan ( 235 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Economy, Entertainment, Humor, Open thread at April 17th, 2012 - 5:00 pm

David Brooks, along with Peggy Noonan, Kathleen Parker, Chris Buckley, Colin Powell, JC Watts and Susan Eisenhower were called the Obamicans. These were Republicans who in 2008 voted and supported Obama. Most of those mentioned have now turned against the Pharaoh. David Brooks is still a die hard believer. He claims that Obama is a fiscally responsible Liberal. Yes, you read that correctly, Brooks believes Obama is fiscally responsible!

I’ve been critical of President Obama’s budgets. I’ve argued that while I like the way Obama preserves spending on things like scientific research and programs for the vulnerable, he doesn’t do enough to avoid a debt crisis.


Extremely senior members of the administration believe these sorts of criticisms are completely unfair and vastly underestimate their fiscal hawkishness. In this column, I thought it only fair that I provide you with a summary of their arguments.

First, their goals. They argue that it’s foolish to try to solve the debt problem with some drastic magic bullet all at once. It’s smarter to stabilize the debt while also looking after other needs, like protecting the vulnerable and investing in things that boost growth and mobility.

They argue that the president’s 2013 budget is a step toward fiscal stability that will also pave the way for bigger steps in the years ahead. They estimate that their budget would produce $5 trillion in budget savings over a decade. It would raise $1.5 trillion in new revenue by raising taxes on those making more than $250,000 a year.


Basically, what we’re looking at is a period of stability, administration officials say, which would soothe credit markets and give us time to make further adjustments. This, they conclude, is responsible prudence.

I’m not going to pass my own comprehensive judgment on this here. I’ll just say that my conversations reaffirm my conviction that Obama is a pragmatic liberal who cares about fiscal sustainability, who has been willing to compromise for its sake, but who has not offered anything close to a sufficient program to avoid a debt crisis.

But we have a campaign in front of us. If the president is truly committed to a strategy for progressive fiscal stability, as Bill Clinton was, he’ll make that the center of his campaign. He’ll earn a mandate. He’ll win over independents who want fiscal discipline but worry about the way Republicans get there.

David Brooks will vote for Obama. This clown is not a  Conservative, but a  Progressives masquerading as a Conservative like David Frum. His claim that the Pharaoh’s regime wants fiscal responsibility is just laughable. David Brooks is water carrier for the regime and he should not be taken serious. To him, Obama is our divine god-king who is leading America to a greater future. Brooks would be writing favorable of Stalin, Hitler or Mao is they were still ar0ound.

This is not a serious thread because David Brooks is not a serious commentator. He’s just a saner version of Charles Johnson.


NY Times claims Obama is now trying to push Job creation

by Rodan ( 36 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Media at January 22nd, 2011 - 6:30 pm

After a year of claiming we are in a historic economic boom, The NY times claims Obama will now push for job creation. The reason for this theme is what I ave been arguing here, the theme of 2012 is that this is as good as it will get. The Progressives will claim Obama is really trying to create jobs, but that corporate America is not helping him. This is a typical 3rd world liberation tactic of a failed leader claiming he’s trying but others are in the way.

Three days before Christmas, President Obama gathered his economic team in the West Wing’s Roosevelt Room to review themes for his State of the Union address. The edge-of-the-cliff crisis he inherited had passed, but with more than 14 million Americans still out of work, he was looking for bold ways to bring down unemployment. The ideas presented to him, though, seemed familiar and uninspired. “You know, guys,” he said, according to someone in the room, “I’ve told you before, I want you to come to me with ideas that excite me.” Nothing he was hearing excited him.


Obama is fighting to keep Republicans, fresh from their fall electoral triumph, from reversing what he has started while prodding his own team to come up with something, anything, to put people back to work. “The president wanted to lower unemployment but didn’t see a way to get more money out of Congress,” one adviser who sat in on many such meetings told me. “He grew frustrated because the economic team didn’t have that magic combination.” Or as another adviser put it, “He was really frustrated that there weren’t solutions on the cheap.”

Read the rest: The White House Looks for Work

Obama’s attitude is startling, he really believes government can create jobs. This idea is devoid of reality and truly a fallacy. Instead of pushing fundamental tax and regulatory reform, he thinks that twisting the arms of business leaders will create joins. Never mind that he pushed Obamacare and the resulting higher insurance costs lead many companies to not increase wages.

As always the NY Times paints a rosy picture of this Obama Boom.

There is a compelling case that Obamanomics has produced results. An economy that was shrinking in size and bleeding more than 700,000 jobs a month is now growing at 2.6 percent and added 1.1 million jobs last year. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, known as the stimulus, produced or saved at least 1.9 million jobs and as many as 4.7 million last year, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The much-derided Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, started by George W. Bush and continued by Obama, stabilized the financial sector, and the big banks have repaid the money with interest. According to a Treasury Department report sent to Congress this month, TARP will cost taxpayers $28 billion instead of the $700 billion originally set aside. The nearly $80 billion bailout of the auto industry may cost taxpayers only $15 billion, as the restructured General Motors and Chrysler come back to life with strong sales. The stock market has surged; corporate profits are setting records.

That’s right, 2.6% growth and 1.1 million jobs created last year is considered an economic miracle. When Bush had similar numbers in 2004-2007, it was called anemic and stagnant. This is the politics of low expectations that Obama hopes will get him re-elected in 20o12. Thus he will appear to be actually trying find ways to create jobs, when in reality he will not take the steps to restore American economic opportunity.

The NY Times can spin it all they want, but Obama doesn’t know what he’s doing.

NY Times justifying high unemployment during the Obama Boom

by Rodan ( 213 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2012, Media, Misery Index, Progressives, Regulation at January 18th, 2011 - 2:00 pm

In the 2000′s when 150,000 jobs a month were created, the Progressive media called it stagnant job growth. They would compare Bush’s record to Clinton and use it as a club. The truth is that due to the nature of the global economy, America is uncompetitive because of its tax and regulatory structure. We have a 20th century model competing in a 21st century economy. The result has been declining wages and living standards for Americans since 2001. Yet the media blamed the Bush tax cuts for this decline and convinced Americans that Conservative policies failed, never mind that Bush was no economic Conservative. Now that Barack Hussein Obama is president, the media is saying that low job growth and high unemployment is normal.

With the release of the December jobs report, employment now officially sits at 9.4 percent and over half of those people have been out of work for over six months. That’s the highest long term unemployment rate since World War II. On top of that, more than 12 million people would like to be employed in full-time jobs but have either given up looking or can only find part-time work.

Yet despite the employment situation, the United States economy continues to recover. Consumer spending is up and investment and corporate profits are doing fine. So how is it possible that by some indications we are currently living in the worst economic conditions since the early 20th century, and by other measures we are living in the most economically productive time in all of history?

Read the rest: Some Jobs Aren’t Needed

That’s right, things are as good as they are going to get. This will be the theme of Obama’s 2012 campaign. He will claim things are the best they can be and will run on his personality. He will use the Tuscon shooting to remind people of his healing abilities and will make it a personality contest. None of the GOP hopefuls like Romney, Palin, Huckabee or Gingrich have any new ideas to restore economic hope and opportunity for Americans. Instead they will push family values and just the mantra of less government to try to beat Obama. This will not work as Obama will make it about him and thus win.

This paragraph from the NY Times article shows the dishonesty of Progressives by smoothing over bad times.

The problem is not over for the persistently unemployed workers, and it’s hard to forecast how long it will take to return to a much lower unemployment rate. Still, U.S. labor markets are relatively free, training opportunities are numerous, and America has not ceased to be a land of opportunity. The current discomfort is not a death rattle, but we do need to learn to live with the growing pains.

Can you imagine them saying this is a Republican was President?

(Hat Tip: M)

Update: The media’s lies of an Obama Boom and his new message of national healer is working. His approval rating is back upamong various polls. The GOP’s surrender in the lame duck session and their lack of aggression is making Obama look strong. The Progressive propaganda is working and unless the GOP gets serious about economic reforms, Obama will be re-elected in 2012.

Progressives count on the Obama Boom for 2012 and update on 9/11 Ground Zero Mosque

by Rodan ( 224 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, CAIR, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Economy, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Islam, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Taliban at November 22nd, 2010 - 11:30 am

Anytime there is a  positive sign from the economy the Progressive media complex proclaims the economy booming. Any slight improvement is heralded and trumped up as signs that we are roaring. The Obama Boom, as it was dubbed by Newsweek, is in reality an anemic economy weighed down by debt. It doesn’t matter to the Left. They redefine the meaning of boom as they see fit. An example was in 2005 when the economy was adding 150,000-200,000 jobs a month (which to be fair was sub-par compared to the job growth in the 80′s and 90′s), they claimed was anemic and signs of a stagnant economy. Now when there are 70,000-150,000 jobs  a month created, Progressives call it impressive jobs creation. In the ultimate example of how the Left will manipulate data, an Economist from the Tranzi elitist school of Yale says his model shows an Obama win in 2012, due to a booming economy.

THINGS are looking up for Barack Obama.

You might not think so, given the flow of news lately. His foreign policy has met with limited success, at best. And, back home, unemployment is mired at 9.6 percent. Earlier this month, in a major political blow, Democrats lost more than 60 seats and control of the House of Representatives.

So what is there for Mr. Obama and his supporters to cheer about?

Try this: Based on the facts at hand right now, Mr. Obama is likely to win the 2012 election in a landslide. That, at least, is the prediction of Ray C. Fair, a Yale economist and an expert on econometrics and on the relationship of economics and politics.

Read the rest: A Forecast That Obama Could Love

Don’t underestimate the Obama Boom theme the media will be pushing hard. Just as they convinced Americans in 2005 the economy was stagnant, they can convince many that the economy is roaring now. Any growth rate of over 2.5% will be declared solid growth and sold to the American people as such. Progressives have the media, entertainment industry and academia. This is a powerful propaganda machine and one that can’t be underestimated. The fact that Barack Hussein Obama is continuing on and not doing a Clinton move to the center but sticking with Far Left policies shows they are confident in his re-election.

Many Conservatives feel 2012 will be a slam dunk, but they are deluding themselves. Progressives have a natural advantage that showed in the last election. Barack Hussein Obama’s appearance on the Daily Show, the fear mongering of the Black Nationalists in that community, the mobilization of Union GOTV efforts, fraud and the media’s non stop attacks on the Tea Party prevented the loss of 15 House Seats and 4 Senate seats. This in a year when the GOP led by double digits. That’s why it’s crucial that the 2012 nominee is a candidate in the Marco Rubio/Chris Cristie mold, Someone who can appeal to the Conservative base AND Independents. If the Republicans nominate someone in the mold of Sharron Angle (Democratic Plant and future Las Vegas hotel greeter), or Christine O’Donnell (nice woman but way out of her league), they are toast against this machine. The right Republican can win, but it will be tough!


Americans across the nation are resisting Islamic Colonialism

by Rodan ( 51 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Elections 2010, Elections 2012, Islam, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Supremacism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law), Tranzis at August 9th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

As Yamamoto warned his fellow Japanese, “We have awakened a sleeping giant”.

Nine years after September 11, 2001 with continued attacks and appeasement on the part of our Progressive bi-partisan elite, the American people have woke up.  Polls show the majority of Americans don’t like Islam and are tired of it’s encroachment in America. The September 11th ground zero Islamic Colonial center was the straw that broke the camel’s back. This is a flagrant insult to our nation and even in Leftist NY the majority of residents are opposed to this abomination. In Staten Island an Islamic Colonial outpost was rejected by the residents of the Midlands neighborhood. From Tennessee to California, Americans have had enough Islamic Imperialism. The article I link to is from the NY Times, so it’s Pro-Islamic, but it shows the growing resistance.

While a high-profile battle rages over a mosque near ground zero in Manhattan, heated confrontations have also broken out in communities across the country where mosques are proposed for far less hallowed locations.

In Murfreesboro, Tenn., Republican candidates have denounced plans for a large Muslim center proposed near a subdivision, and hundreds of protesters have turned out for a march and a county meeting.

In late June, in Temecula, Calif., members of a local Tea Party group took dogs and picket signs to Friday prayers at a mosque that is seeking to build a new worship center on a vacant lot nearby.

In Sheboygan, Wis., a few Christian ministers led a noisy fight against a Muslim group that sought permission to open a mosque in a former health food store bought by a Muslim doctor.

At one time, neighbors who did not want mosques in their backyards said their concerns were over traffic, parking and noise — the same reasons they might object to a church or a synagogue. But now the gloves are off.

In all of the recent conflicts, opponents have said their problem is Islam itself. They quote passages from the Koran and argue that even the most Americanized Muslim secretly wants to replace the Constitution with Islamic Shariah law.

Read the rest: Across Nation, Mosque Projects Meet Opposition

The fact the Tranzi Totalitarian Progressive rag, the NY Times, is lamenting that Americans are resisting their Islamic allies shows that they are scared. For too long our leaders (in both parties) have appeased and even given immigration preferences to people from Islamic countries and have taught the Islamic version of history in our own schools. Islam is the one religion that is not allowed to be attacked while Catholic and Evangelical bashing is encouraged in our society.

Well no more, the sleeping giant has awakened and we are no longer tolerant of our enemies.

This is my message to Dar Al Islam: Don’t expect that the next Republican President will declare your racist ideology a religion of peace. Don’t expect that in the next round of fighting we will go in as goody goodies and build you schools. Expect nothing but a Mongol style destruction without mercy. Our patience is running out and after we destroy the Progressive movement and restore our economy you are next!

Take that as warning from a pissed of American!

(Hat Tip: Gus802)

NY Times hails Progressive Era

by Rodan ( 29 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Election 2008, Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis at May 22nd, 2010 - 11:30 am

The Radical Totalitarian Progressive agenda is being shoved down the throats of the American people. From the eugenics based Obamacare to the ‘borrow massively from China act’ aka the Stimulus Bill, the Progressives are imposing their will despite polls. The NY Times, which is their main propaganda paper, is hailing this as a new era. They proclaim it a Progressive era. This is gloating that they are ruling against the will of the people.

With the Senate’s passage of financial regulation, Congress and the White House have completed 16 months of activity that rival any other since the New Deal in scope or ambition. Like the Reagan Revolution or Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, the new progressive period has the makings of a generational shift in how Washington operates.

First came a stimulus bill that, while aimed mainly at ending a deep recession, also set out to remake the nation’s educational system and vastly expand scientific research. Then President Obama signed a health care bill that was the biggest expansion of the safety net in 40 years. And now Congress is in the final stages of a bill that would tighten Wall Street’s rules and probably shrink its profit margins.

Read the rest: A Progressive Agenda to Remake Washington

They are celebrating the imposition of a Neo-Feudal system on America. This is the reason the NY Times is a collapsing paper. They are against the American people.

NY Times snitches on CIA and Blackwater

by Rodan ( 289 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Media, Progressives, Tranzis at December 11th, 2009 - 5:00 am

There was a saying when I was growing up in NYC back in the late 80′s/Early 90′s, snitches catch stitches. The NY Times seems to have not gotten that memo. This rag of a Progressive paper has ratted out our nation on many occasions. Back in the 30′s this same Paper supported Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini. They have supported our enemies throughout it’s history. Now they rat out CIA and Blackwater operations that helped defeat the Iraqi Insurgents.


WASHINGTON — Private security guards from Blackwater Worldwide participated in some of the C.I.A.’s most sensitive activities — clandestine raids with agency officers against people suspected of being insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan and the transporting of detainees, according to former company employees and intelligence officials.

The raids against suspects occurred on an almost nightly basis during the height of the Iraqi insurgency from 2004 to 2006, with Blackwater personnel playing central roles in what company insiders called “snatch and grab” operations, the former employees and current and former intelligence officers said.

Read the rest.

The NY Times is a Tranzi Progressive newspaper. They don’t care about or support America. The question is, who gave them this information? I would not be shocked if the treacherous Obama regime gave the Times this information. As for the Blackwater Operatives that talked, shame on you for betraying secrets. Snitching is dishonorable and a form of treachery.

American Progressives Support the Iranian Regime

by Rodan ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Ahmadinejad, Elections, Iran, Islamists, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Media at June 15th, 2009 - 7:23 am

If there is any doubt over the existence of the Leftist-Islamic alliance this is should remove it. The NY Times and Washington Post have come out in support of Ahmadinejad and the Ayatollah regimes. Both papers are part of the American Progressive attack machine. The Left loves the Iranian Mullahs as they are viewed as allies in their struggle with the traditional Judeo-Christian Civilization of the West. The fact that the Iranian regime has called for Israel’s extermination is also a reason they support them.

The Iranian People Speak

The election results in Iran may reflect the will of the Iranian people. Many experts are claiming that the margin of victory of incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the result of fraud or manipulation, but our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin — greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday’s election.

While Western news reports from Tehran in the days leading up to the voting portrayed an Iranian public enthusiastic about Ahmadinejad’s principal opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, our scientific sampling from across all 30 of Iran’s provinces showed Ahmadinejad well ahead.

These people can’t be serious. Every serious journalist in Iran said the momentum was for Mir Hossein Mousavi. The riots clearly show the people of Iran didn’t support Amaddinejad. However the Washington Post clearly lies and supports the fraud.

Leader Emerges With Stronger Hand

TEHRAN — The jokes among Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s detractors are legion. In one, he looks in the mirror and says, “Male lice to the right, female lice to the left.” In the West, one American tabloid rarely misses a chance to refer to him as “Evil Madman” and in the days before his re-election here he was taunted as a “monkey” and as a “midget.”

But the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who was announced winner of a second four-year term this week is no cartoon character. Whether his 63 percent victory is truly the will of the people or the result of fraud, it demonstrated that Mr. Ahmadinejad is the shrewd and ruthless front man for a clerical, military and political elite that is more unified and emboldened than at any time since the 1979 revolution.

Ahmadinejad has a stronger hand? The people in Iran are angry and don’t accept the result. The NY Times clearly is supporting the Ayatollahs and their tool Ahmadinejad. It’s no coincidence that the NY Times was always against the bombing of Iran’s nuke sites. Their excuse was that it would destabilize the region. It is now apparent they support the regime.

The Progressives always claim that they are for people power. Obviously, this is not s. If it was, they would support the Iranian people. They support the Islamo-Fascist whom they view as allies. This is why Obama isn’t supporting the people, he loves the Ayatollah regime. Progressives are really Totalitarian Fascists and their reaction to the events in Iran exposes their colors