► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Progressives’

Enough with the ‘Coexist’ stickers already!

by 1389AD ( 89 Comments › )
Filed under Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness at August 28th, 2010 - 10:00 am

It takes a particular type of self-righteous and aggressive ignoramus to think that the real evils of this world will all go away if enough people can be shamed or bullied into denying that those evils exist.

Case in point:

Russell Simmons Unveils ‘Coexist’ Banner Near Ground Zero

Huge 'coexist' symbol banner in the apartment windows of Russell Simmons near Ground Zero

Simmons’ apartment on Liberty St. overlooks Ground Zero. Each letter of the banner features different religious and spiritual symbols. Like Bloomberg, Simmons is a big supporter of the planned center: “I was trying to figure out ways I could reach people and promote a message of tolerance…The fact that it is a public discussion, that there’s so many against it is what I think is disappointing to me, that so many people don’t know that we founded our country on the First Amendment,” he told the AP.

Read the rest.


I am not the only one to complain

Recently, I have noticed that I am not the only one who despises this asinine symbolic slogan:

YouTube: Allen West Hates the Co-Exist Bumper Sticker
h/t: Kitman TV

More of Allen West’s speech here.


Coexist Reaction: The Good, The Bad, The Just Plain Silly

By Charlie Sykes
Story Created: May 15, 2009
(Story Updated: May 15, 2009)

As John McAdams sums up the story so far:

It all started with a parody from Tom McMahon, who was aggravated by the extremely smug and intellectually slovenly bumper sticker in which a variety of religious symbols spell out “COEXIST.”

McMahon produced a parody bumper sticker with Nazi and Communist symbols substituted.

His point, of course, was that some religious views are simply impossible to coexist with, and must (like Nazism and Communism) be fought.

Read the rest.


Update: Here’s another parody, courtesy of Mike C. on Blogmocracy:

‘Coexist’ in Firearm Manufacturer Logos

Parody of 'Coexist' bumper sticker spelled out in firearm manufacturers' logos


The underlying spiritual problem

When ‘tolerance’ proves to be nothing more than moral indifference and cowardice cloaked in self-righteousness, it is not a virtue but a vice.

Gates of Vienna: The Sin That Believes in Nothing

We Christians strongly believe in tolerance, and this is what British novelist Dorothy Sayers pointed out about “Tolerance”:

In this world it is called Tolerance, but in hell it is called indifference, the sin that believes in nothing, cares for nothing, seeks to know nothing, interferes with nothing, enjoys nothing, hates nothing, finds purpose in nothing, lives for nothing, and remains alive because there is nothing for which it will die.

If any viewpoint is equally as valid as any other, then no viewpoint has any meaning, and it matters not what any of us thinks, says, or does. This philosophy is truly satanic, and it is called nihilism.


► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Coming to a City Near You

by Bunk X ( 88 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Financial, Open thread, Progressives, Regulation, Socialism at August 19th, 2010 - 7:00 pm

By now, most of you have heard about the bizarre racketeering in the City of Bell California, one of the poorest cities in California with a per capita average annual income of less than $40,000. Recently it was discovered that the city council, fire chief and others were paying themselves six figures, up to a jaw dropping $1.5 million for the city manager Robert Rizzo, paid for with property taxes and extortion using a towing company with connections to the police department. Rizzo, btw, lives in Huntington Beach.

Now, let’s talk about subterranean extortion. From the Huntington Beach City News:

HUNTINGTON BEACH...The Huntington Beach City Council on Monday night voted to charge out-of-town residents a fee that could be has high as $2,000 to $3,000 if they have an emergency response service in Surf City. The fee would be used to recover charges for time and equipment that respond to the scene (fire trucks, police patrol vehicles, helicopter, etc.) of a accident.This fee would include vehicle accidents and fires, pipe line and power line damages. This fee would not apply to Huntington Beach residents as their taxes go toward paying for this service.

Four Orange County cities already have fees to charge non-residents, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Garden Grove and Santa Ana. Santa Ana charges a fee for both residents and non-residents alike. The extra billed fees would be passed on to the person’s insurance company. This would most likely increase the premium of everyone’s insurance policy as more cities decide to charge fees for emergency response services. Those who were without insurance, the bill would go directly to the driver and most likely not be paid.

Huntington Beach expects that these fees would bring in approximately $100,000 a year to go for equipment repair and replacement and other city needs.

Typical emergency response service fees

Car accidents with fluids (oil, gasoline, diesel) : $595
Car fire: $750
Extrication: $2,000
Pipeline or power line basic response: $405
Pipeline or power line intermediate response: $1,120
Fire Chief response: $210 an hour
Miscellaneous equipment charges: $405-$505 an hour

Huntington Beach, CA, has been operating in the red for years, and this economy hasn’t helped. Up and down Beach Boulevard and throughout the city, car dealerships, professional buildings and other commercial property are either boarded up or mostly empty. Recently, H.B. has been strong arming one of the last small beach communities to annex them, even though most of the residents of Seal Beach oppose being told what to do by the socialists of Surf City.

So where to get the money? Extort it from insurance companies, which means you.

Lookee here. Say you have a fender bender with an uninsured motorist within the city boundary. Say your vehicle skidded to a stop near a power pole, the radiator’s leaking, but no one’s trapped inside a vehicle, no injuries. Say the other vehicle is disabled and blocking traffic.

While you and Mr. or  Ms. Uninsured are discussing ways to settle,

The Fire Department is dispatched to verify the antifreeze is not flammable;
The Police Department is dispatched to make sure you’re not duking it out and to direct traffic until the city-sanctioned towing company arrives;
Helicopter surveillance (miscellaneous);
City Public Works inspectors are sent to verify that the power pole is still standing.

Assuming that the city folks with hourly rates keep their visits to 60 minutes, and not 60 minutes + 1, (that’ll never happen, right?) you’re gonna be nailed with a minimum of $2,020 up front, not counting the rate increase on your insurance for merely driving through the city. Plus, unless you pay for collision insurance,  you’ll have to pay repair your car yourself because Huntington Beach is an undeclared “Sanctuary City” with a lot of uninsured drivers.

As for Huntington Beach spokesholes claiming they’re only going to get $100,000 per year, it’s bogus. Ignoring fatalites, extrications, etc., in 2008, there were a total of 1,755 accidents reported. Multiply that by A MINIMUM of $2,020 per accident  produces a minimum value of OVER THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS PER YEAR FOR MAINTENANCE.

Oh yeah. They said it’s for maintenance and [ahem],  “other city needs.” Pheeeeew.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Two Rat-Bastard Commies and a Brilliant Capitalist

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 92 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections, History, Misery Index, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at August 12th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

Of course, the commies are President Obungler himself, and that blithering idiotic libturd fossil from yesteryear, Phil Donahue.

The brilliant capitalist is the late, great Nobel-prize winning (ya know, from back in the olden days, when you actually had to have accomplished something to win one) economist, Dr. Milton Friedman.

First, we have a damn good GOP commercial that will hopefully soon be coming to a TV near you, about how Obama, Reid, Pelosi, etc. have screwed the pooch (FYI, no insult meant to dogs) since day one when it comes to fixing the economy, and only made things exponentially worse.

But it wouldn’t surprise me a bit if they are actually f#*king up our country and economy on purpose, since we know they want as many Americans as possible dependent upon brain-dead libs for their existence. And just this week, we reached an all-time high, with well over 40 million Americans (over 13% of our population) now receiving food stamps. Congratulations libturds, hope you’re all proud of yourselves.

And on top of that good news comes this, on youth unemployment hitting an all-time high, and this, about 484 thousand new unemployment claims filed for in July, highest since February, and this, about the near rioting that occurred in Atlanta by people Obama voters wanting section 8 (which is government taxpayer subsidized) housing.

But, I, like you, sure am damn glad that the economy is actually recovering, as Obungler tells us it is, and that we’re on the right track, because if he didn’t tell us, our only other choice would be to believe what we see, hear, and read, about how bad things are.

Then we have a vintage video of the still clueless after all these years (hat tip to Paul Simon, the singer, not the dead lib Senator from IL) Phil Donahue, yet another libturd dolt who never met a commie dictator he didn’t admire, getting bitch-slapped and kicked in the nuts by Dr. Friedman for suggesting that socialism will even the playing field between the haves and the have-nots better and fairer than capitalism will. Watch the part where Friedman attempts to tell Donahue why he’s an economic ignoramus, and Donahue has this glazed look in his eyes like he’s high. Nope, he’s not stoned, just stupid.

Liberals. Gotta love detest the sons of bitches. I know I do.

Hat tip to Denny for the videos.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Another Hidden Zinger in Obamacare

by 1389AD ( 43 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Financial, Healthcare, Progressives at July 25th, 2010 - 10:00 am

In Fundamentally Transforming the United States, Phyllis Schlafly explains how the Democrat party voter base is founded upon those who get (or hope to get) their livelihood from the federal government. It goes much further than Chicago-machine patronage politics writ large; the federal government is deliberately destroying the family structure so as to make people more dependent on the federal government and the Democrat party. Unmarried mothers are a key part of Obama’s voter base. Thus, it is in his interests to discourage men and women from getting and staying married.

How do the Democrats go about attacking the family structure? The attacks go much further than promoting gay marriage and abortion on demand, or free condoms and salacious “sex education” in the public schools. Detrimental as those things are, at least they are visible. It’s the progressives’ stealth jihad against the family that I’m talking about here.

Check out this hidden zinger in Obamacare:

Marriage Penalty in Health Care

A huge marriage penalty is hidden in Obama’s Health Control Law. This law is another federal program providing financial incentives to subsidize marriage avoidance and illegitimate offspring.

Even though all evidence shows that marriage is the best remedy for poverty, lack of health care, domestic violence, child abuse, and school dropouts, federal welfare programs continue to discriminate against marriage and instead give taxpayer handouts to those who reject marriage. This isn’t any accident; it is a central part of the Democrats’ political strategy that produced 70% of unmarried women voting for Obama for President in 2008.

Here is the approximate cost in the Health Control Law for an unmarried couple who each earn $25,000 a year (total: $50,000). When they both buy health insurance (which will be mandatory), the combined premiums they pay will be capped at $3,076 a year. But if the couple gets married and has the same combined income of $50,000, they will pay annual premiums up to a cap of $5,160 a year. That means they have to fork over a marriage penalty of $2,084.

The marriage penalty is the result of the fact that government subsidies for buying health insurance are pegged to the federal poverty guidelines. Couples that remain unmarried are rewarded with a separate health care subsidy for each income.

When the Wall Street Journal reporter quizzed the Democratic authors of the health care bill, they made it clear that this differential was deliberate. The staffer justified the discriminatory treatment because “you have to decide what your goals are.” Indeed, the Democrats have decided what their goals are. They know that 70% of unmarried women voted for Obama in 2008, and the Democrats plan to reward this group with health insurance subsidies.

The House staffer told the Wall Street Journal reporter that the Democrats can’t make the subsidies neutral towards marriage because that would give a traditional one-breadwinner married couple a more generous subsidy than a single parent at the same income level. Horrors! The Democrats certainly are not going to allow traditional marriage to be preferred over couples who just shack up!

Daniel Patrick Moynihan famously and accurately explained the disastrous results of welfare back in 1965. The welfare system created a matriarchy with millions of children lacking their father in the home. It’s no wonder illegitimate birthrates are soaring and unmarried mothers now give birth to 4 out of every 10 babies born in the United States.

Means-tested welfare programs already cost taxpayers close to $1 trillion a year (even more than national defense!), and Obamacare is projected to add another $2.5 trillion after all its provisions take effect. There’s no end in sight to the increasing costs of these entitlements. In one year, the Obama Administration will spend more taxpayers’ money on spreading the wealth to non-taxpayers than George W. Bush spent on the entire Iraq war.

Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, a liberal firm that consults for clients such as Bill Clinton and John Kerry, admitted: “Unmarried women represent one of the most reliable Democratic cohorts in the electorate . . . leading the charge for fundamental change in health care.”

It used to be that a husband was responsible for the financial support of his wife and children, but the feminists’ agenda calls for replacing husbands with Big Brother Government. The feminists call their movement “women’s liberation,” and Obamacare is one more way to help them achieve their goal.

Feminists keep tightening their control over the social policies of the Democratic Party, and Obamacare will be his third payoff to the feminists. The first bill Obama signed as President, the Lilly Ledbetter Act, enables women to sue employers years many years after any alleged workplace discrimination (when no one is still alive to defend against allegations), and the second payoff was getting Obama to give the majority of taxpayer-paid Stimulus jobs to women even though men have suffered the big majority of job losses.

Read it all.

The scavenger hunt is on

I am neither a lawyer nor an accountant nor a “policy wonk” (whatever that is supposed to be). Sorting through the huge pile of paperwork that makes up the Obamacare bill, or for that matter, the recent financial regulatory bill, and piecing together the hidden “zingers” that are poised to harm each sector of our economy and society, is beyond my capabilities. This is not a one-person job. I would like to urge everyone who is able to do so, to help complete this task by researching how those bills will affect their community and their sector of the economy, and submit that information to 2.0: The Blogmocracy.

The scavenger hunt is on, and the only prize is preserving your freedom.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Saturday Lecture: The 45 Goals of Communism

by coldwarrior ( 17 Comments › )
Filed under Cold War, Communism, Open thread, Progressives, saturday lecture series at July 17th, 2010 - 8:00 am

These are the 45 goals of Communism (as cited by Beck and by Jim Quinn). I know many of you have already seen this list, some may have not. I want to get them back into the conversation here as a reference point on what the progressive trans-nationalist are trying to do the the US. Some may be a little antiquated, others are right in the leftist playbook to this day. So for today’s lecture, read each one and think yes/no/in progress. What is the grade for the left and the grade for the right?

Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35

January 10, 1963, Current Communist Goals, EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Thursday, January 10, 1963:

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman’s request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following “Current Communist Goals,” which she identifies as an excerpt from “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

A book review- “Whiny Little Bitch: The Excuse-Filled Presidency of Barack Obama”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 137 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Communism, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections 2010, Misery Index, Progressives at June 25th, 2010 - 9:00 am

First of all, believe it or not, this is an actual book! But, if you’d like to order a copy ($14.95), please note that it will not be released until June 29th. I hope that a lot of other people will also want to read about the Whiny Little Bitch in the White House, and it becomes a New York Slimes #1 best-seller, but I digress.

It’s written by Mike Cullen, and it’s about the total incompetency of the America-hating POS that occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Av. NW, the man-child bungler-in-chief himself, and the other America-hating scumbags, that, like cockroaches, infest his pathetic, inept socialism-loving administration.

Here’s the introduction, and it’s excellent, because it is spot-on…

I had never seen anything like it. Only 44 men have held the office of President of the United States. This guy gets into office, and even one year later, he still can’t stop sniveling about the man who held the position before him. Can you picture Abraham Lincoln engaging in a year-long whine about James Buchanan? I inherited this slavery problem, you know. So don’t get your hopes to high.

Touché! Beautifully written, huh? I thought so, also!

But I know, you want more, huh? I’ve got more!!!

About Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Incompetano, Cullen writes:

She’s proof that there is at least one person in Washington who is less qualified for her job than Barack Obama is for his.

Bwahahahaha!!!

Then there’s a chapter called “The 7 Habits of a Highly Ineffective President”. BTW, habit #7 is priceless!

1. I Didn’t Explain it Right- There’s nothing wrong with the policy. You yokels are too stupid to understand it.

2. Let Me Be clear- Let me be clear is the rhetorical equivalent of an exploding dye pack in a bag of cash. It indelibly marks all words that follow as false. “Let me be clear” pegs my bullshit meter.

3. Conflation – Treating two different concepts as if they were one: In an attempt to marginalize the Tea Party movement, Obama described them as people who question whether he is a US citizen and believe he’s a socialist. Two totally unrelated things.

4. The False Choice- When Americans look to their government for responsible solutions, Barack Obama lives to offer us the false choice. We can either support his stale brand of socialism or we can do nothing.

5. The False Promise- Closing Gitmo. Broadcasting the health care debate on CSPAN.

6. Blaming Your Opponents- Even more bizarre were his repeated attempts to blame Republicans for his own failures. With an overwhelming Democrat majority in the House and a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, he still didn’t sign a single piece of major legislation in 2009.

7. Talking out of Your Ass- In situations that require a careful, measured (Let’s say presidential) response, Barack Obama comes across like the barroom drunk who thinks he’s an expert on everything. Facts are not important. Barry’s got something to say, and it’s a free country, dammit.

Examples: Skip Gates. Comments about Las Vegas.

This thread also ties in, rather nicely, to what former Florida governor Jeb Bush said Wednesday about Obama:

Jeb Bush tells President Obama: Stop blaming George W. Bush

Former Florida GOP Gov. Jeb Bush has grown tired of listening to Barack Obama blame his brother, telling Matt Bai, the “Political Times” columnist for The New York Times, that he finds the president’s behavior “childish.”

In an interview with Bai, Bush said that he has had enough of Obama frequently pointing back to his brother George W. Bush’s tenure to explain economic and budget problems, as well as failed oversight of the oil industry.

“It’s kind of like a kid coming to school saying, ‘The dog ate my homework,’” the former governor said of the president. “It’s childish. This is what children do until they mature. They don’t accept responsibility.”

“He apparently likes to act like he’s still campaigning, and he likes to blame George’s administration for everything,” Bush added.

Bush went on to criticize the president’s own stewardship of the economy, calling Obama “Hubert Humphrey on steroids.”

Read the whole piece here.

A tip o’ the hat to Denny!

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

The Most Dangerous President in History

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 130 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Liberal Fascism, Progressives at June 21st, 2010 - 8:30 pm

From GOPUSA-

By Henry Lamb June 21, 2010 7:29 AM

Obama believes in the rule of law- his law. No other law is relevant. No other law matters. When Obama speaks, he expects the world to obey.

In his Tuesday night performance, he said “I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business…” “Inform him?” Where does Barack Hussein Obama get the authority to issue orders to the CEO of a private corporation? There is no such authority in the Constitution. There is no law that empowers the president to “inform” the CEO of any corporation how he will spend the corporation’s money. Obama couldn’t care less about the Constitution or the law.

There was no Constitutional authority for him to essentially take over General Motors and Chrysler, or the banks. Obama couldn’t care less about the law. When he speaks, he expects the world to obey.

There is no Constitutional authority for the federal government to require American citizens to purchase health insurance or any other product or service. It doesn’t matter. Obama spoke; his Congressional majority of comrades obeyed.

In 18 months, the man has demonstrated that he cares nothing about the system of government created by our founders and enshrined in the Constitution. He has demonstrated that he fully intends to “fundamentally transform” the United States of America — as he promised in his campaign. Now we are beginning to get a picture of the nation he intends to build. The picture is frightening.

Read the rest here: Lamb: The Most Dangerous President in History

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Left vs. Right

by Bunk X ( 176 Comments › )
Filed under American Supremacy, Education, Media, Open thread, Patriotism, Politics, Progressives, Socialism at June 13th, 2010 - 11:00 pm

[Found here.]

The best summary of the various forms of government I’ve ever seen was in this must-see video from a year or so ago. If any of my fellow netizens haven’t seen it, it’s required viewing IMO.

I know I’m preaching to the choir, but if any of you have kids or grandkids that haven’t seen that video, it’s worth paying them to watch it.

Did someone say Open Thread?

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Lone Jewish High School Student Faces Down Arab Mob in L.A.

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 200 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Gaza, Hamas, Hezballah, Holocaust, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Jihad, Judaism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Palestinians, Progressives, Sharia (Islamic Law) at June 2nd, 2010 - 1:30 pm

Lone Jewish High School Student Faces Down Arab Mob in LA

A loud and angry mob of pro-Arab demonstrators outside the Israeli consulate in Los Angeles on Tuesday became even more enraged when one, lone Jewish high school student with a yarmulke and a large Israeli flag marched fearlessly alongside them.

The young man seemed to be unmoved by the angry curses hurled at him by the American-Arab crowd. Though protected by a line of policemen, it appeared he could be attacked at any moment.

Reporters asked him afterwards about his unusual presence, and he explained, “I came out because I want to defend Israel…They (the soldiers attempting to divert the flotilla ships) were attacked, and they had the right to defend [themselves]. These people [on the boats] were not humanitarians; their ship was armed with knives, batons, and all kinds of things to attack the Israelis with. There is a naval blockade on Gaza, and they [the soldiers] were just doing their job of enforcing it… Hamas is a terrorist organization trying to kill Israelis.”

Asked if he is affiliated with any group, he said, “Just Judaism and Israel, that’s it.”

[...]

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Great op-ed: It’s all Bush’s fault!

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 64 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Economy, Elections, Financial, Health Care, Misery Index, Politics, Progressives, illegals at May 29th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

Here’s a great op-ed by Chuck Green, a life-long democrat who writes a column for the Aurora (Colorado) Sentinel…

By CHUCK GREEN

Barack Obama is setting a record-setting number of records during his first year in office.

Largest budget ever. Largest deficit ever. Largest number of broken promises ever. Most self-serving speeches ever. Largest number of agenda-setting failures ever. Fastest dive in popularity ever.

Wow. Talk about change.

Just one year ago, fresh from his inauguration celebrations, President Obama was flying high. After one of the nation’s most inspiring political campaigns, the election of America ’s first black president had captured the hopes and dreams of millions. To his devout followers, it was inconceivable that a year later his administration would be gripped in self-imposed crisis.

Of course, they don’t see it as self imposed. It’s all George Bush’s fault.

George Bush, who doesn’t have a vote in Congress and who no longer occupies the White House, is to blame for it all.

He broke Obama’s promise to put all bills on the White House web site for five days before signing them.

He broke Obama’s promise to have the congressional health care negotiations broadcast live on C-SPAN.

He broke Obama’s promise to end earmarks.

He broke Obama’s promise to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent.

He broke Obama’s promise to close the detention center at Guantanamo in the first year.

He broke Obama’s promise to make peace with direct, no pre-condition talks with America ’s most hate-filled enemies during his first year in office, ushering in a new era of global cooperation.

He broke Obama’s promise to end the hiring of former lobbyists into high White House jobs.

He broke Obama’s promise to end no-compete contracts with the government.

He broke Obama’s promise to disclose the names of all attendees at closed White House meetings.

He broke Obama’s promise for a new era of bipartisan cooperation in all matters.

He broke Obama’s promise to have chosen a home church to attend Sunday services with his family by Easter of last year.

Yes, it’s all George Bush’s fault. President Obama is nothing more than a puppet in the never-ending, failed Bush administration.

If only George Bush wasn’t still in charge, all of President Obama’s problems would be solved. His promises would have been kept, the economy would be back on track, Iran would have stopped its work on developing a nuclear bomb and would be negotiating a peace treaty with Israel , North Korea would have ended its tyrannical regime, and integrity would have been restored to the federal government.

Read the rest here, it’s well worth it!

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Raaaaacism?

by Bunk X ( 138 Comments › )
Filed under Crime, Democratic Party, Humor, Open thread, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressives, Racism, illegals at May 26th, 2010 - 11:00 pm

Yesterday, hackers changed the message on one of the ubiquitous portable illuminated traffic signs in Florida. From NBC Miami, we get this report:

A highway sign flashing “NO LATINOS NO TACOS” greeted drivers on the Palmetto Expressway in Northwest Miami-Dade, after hackers managed to alter it early Tuesday morning.

The sign was in the northbound side of the 826, right near the Northwest 25th street exit.

It’s unknown how long the sign had been flashing the message, but by 6 a.m., members of the Florida Highway Patrol and a road crew had turned the sign away from the highway and were working to erase the message.

Almost immediately the MSM and left-wing blogs (like this one) tagged the prank as right-wing racism. Seems that everyone has forgotten about this unadulterated image:

According to the race-baiters, illegal immigrants and legal hispanics are way too stooopid to figure out the complexity of a programmable road sign, so it’s gotta be the evil Mr. Whitey McConservative. Good thing that the lovely and gracious Missus X is a Latina, because I’d never be able figure out how to make tacos or burritos on my own.

Meanwhile, this was spotted near Copperhill, Tennessee:

Much of today’s racism is promoted by the left, just like it always has been. And because of it, we have another post for an Overnight Open Thread.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

WSB-TV Investigates U.S. Border Security (or lack thereof)

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 130 Comments › )
Filed under Al Qaeda, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Islamic Invasion, Islamic Terrorism, Islamists, Mexico, Political Correctness, Progressives, Terrorism, illegals at May 21st, 2010 - 8:30 am

WSB-TV in Atlanta reports moo-slimes from Iran, Pock-ee-ston (as the idiot-in-chief calls it), Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, etc., are being apprehended on a regular basis crossing illegally into the Arizona and Texas from Mexico. I guess they’re also coming to do jobs Americans won’t do…

Video part 1

Video part 2

Hat tip to Denny at GrouchyOldCripple.com

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Carter, Clinton pollsters: How the libs can avoid a November bloodbath

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 158 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Dhimmitude, Economy, Health Care, Misery Index, Multiculturalism, Patriotism, Politics, Progressives at April 16th, 2010 - 4:00 pm

They can all slit their wrists in October. No blood, no bloodbaths! :) Just kidding (well, kinda), but fortunately for us, they’re:

A. Too stupid to listen, or:
B. Too arrogant to listen, or:
C. Clueless F**king morons who are both A and B.
I realize that I’m going out on a limb here, but I’m leaning towards C…

How the Democrats can avoid a November bloodbath

By Douglas E. Schoen and Patrick H. Caddell
Friday, April 16, 2010

Media reports suggest that President Obama is turning his attention toward the midterm congressional elections. There are a few things it is imperative he understand if he is to, at the least, minimize Democratic losses in November.

We are Democratic pollsters who argued against the health-care legislation ["Democrats' blind ambition," Washington Forum, March 12] that the Obama administration chose to pursue. Instead, we advocated incremental health-care reform. With the passage of health reform, some harsh political realities have emerged.

Recent polling shows that despite lofty predictions that a broad-based Democratic constituency would be activated by the bill’s passage, the bill has been an incontrovertible disaster. The most recent Rasmussen Reports poll, released on April 12, shows that 58 percent of the electorate supports a repeal of the health-care reform bill — up from 54 percent two weeks earlier. Fueling this backlash is concern that health-care reform will drive up health costs and expand the role of government, and the belief that passage was achieved by fundamentally anti-democratic means. Already we are seeing the implications play out with the retirement of Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) — who had effectively become the face of the last-minute, closed-door negotiations that resulted in passage.

Put simply, there has been no bounce, for the president or his party, from passing health care.

In fact, Monday’s Gallup report showed the president’s weekly job approval rating at a low of 47 percent. And as the Democratic Party’s favorability has dropped to 41 percent — the lowest in Gallup’s 18-year history of measuring it — this week’s Rasmussen Reports survey shows the Republican Party with a nine-point lead in the generic congressional vote. Moreover, independents, who are more energized than Democrats, are leaning Republican by a 2-to-1 margin.

Read the rest here

Rodan Update: Stuart Rothenberg has 44 seats moving into the Republican column. If this happens in November, The GOP wins the House of Representative.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

The upcoming elections in the UK: a choice between an uber-progressive, another uber-progressive, and an Alinksy-quoting “conservative”

by Delectable ( 183 Comments › )
Filed under Liberal Fascism, Progressives, Tranzis, UK at April 8th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

Behold, the upcoming elections in the UK!

In the Labour Party - Gordon “Ugly Dumpling” Brown

Current Prime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party.

In the Tory Corner - David “I look like Larry Bird” Cameron -

Current Leader of the Tory Party. Educated at Eton and Oxford University.

In the Liberal-Democratic (aka Socialist) corner – Nick “Nobody knows who I am” Clegg

Now, the problems with Gordon Brown are well known and documented repeatedly, many times over, and also involve banning Geert Wilders from the country. It should go without saying that Nick Clegg, from the far-leftist Liberal-Democratic Party, which has the abominable open antisemite Baronness Jenny Tonge as the Lib-Dem party whip, is a committed far-leftist.

Yet I would caution against putting any hopes in David Cameron of the Tories as some form of “conservative hope” for the UK future. If this article is to be believed, David Cameron is hardly better than Gordon Brown. From the looks of it, he might even be worse. It looks like the choice will be between varying shades of progressivism for the British public.

The special relationship between Mrs Thatcher and Ronald Reagan was based on a genuine meeting of minds. The two leaders shared core beliefs in anti-communism and small government. But, since then, the Republicans have moved right and the Tories have moved left. The Republican party has just made it clear that it regards state-run healthcare as on a par with Satanism. But Mr Cameron tells British voters that he treasures the National Health Service. Only last week, the Tory leader gave a speech on community organisation in which he explicitly praised the late Saul Alinsky – a Chicago-based social organiser who is a bogeyman for many Republicans, who regard him as Mr Obama’s socialist Godfather.

From guns to God to taxes to climate change, the Tories and the Republicans are really no longer on the same political planet. This problem would become far more acute if a Tory victory in Britain next month was followed by a sweeping Republican victory in the mid-term congressional elections in November. Who exactly would a Prime Minister Cameron side with when political war broke out on the other side of the Atlantic? His political allies in Congress or his political hero in the White House?

Be sure to read it all. Then read this very important column about the Tories in the UK, and their resemblance to Obamism.

For the record, this is the quote in question, as said by David Cameron: “This plan is directly based on the successful community organising movement established by Saul Alinsky in the United States and has successfully trained generations of community organisers, including President Obama.”

And weep for the future of the UK.

Update: Here is more information on David Cameron here and here.

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon

Dimocrat Staffer: Constituent calls are “harassment”

by Bob in Breckenridge ( 81 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Free Speech, Liberal Fascism, Politics, Progressives at March 24th, 2010 - 5:30 pm

The arrogance of these liberal scumbags is breathtaking…

Posted By Capitol Confidential On March 19, 2010

Yesterday, I decided to call Rep. John Garamendi’s (D-CA) office in Washington, D.C. He’s my representative and I wanted to voice my opposition to the Senate Health Care Bill. I spoke with a female staffer and politely told her that, while I support health care reform, I oppose the Senate Bill because it wasn’t true “reform.” She said the Congressman thinks it’s a good bill and that he campaigned on health care reform. I told her I knew that. I also mentioned that I voted for him. When I tried to give her specific reasons why the Senate Bill would harm our system rather than reform it, she refused to listen. She said she was very busy and hung up on me. Being the persistent person that I am, I kept calling back. Each time I tried to finish my point, she hung up.

I called one more time. This time she said, “If you call one more time, we will notify Capital Police.” I asked why my conduct warranted involving federal law enforcement agents. She said I was “harassing” her. I tried to explain that trying to convince a representative to change his or her vote didn’t constitute “harassment.” Before I could fully explain, she hung up again.

I called back. This time, I asked to speak to her supervisor in order to report her repeated hanging up as well as the threat she made. I was placed on hold. Thinking I was holding for her supervisor, I was shocked when a Federal Agent with the Capital Police picked-up the telephone.

[...]

Read the whole article here: The Heat is On: Congressman’s Office Says Constituent Calls Are ‘Harassment’ (and be sure to read the comments!)

► Hot Links

Post to Twitter Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to StumbleUpon