► Show Top 10 Hot Links

Posts Tagged ‘Saudi Arabia’

Our Friends, the Wahhabists…and the Saudi Textbooks.

by coldwarrior ( 129 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Supremacism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamic hypocrisy, Islamists, Terrorism at June 30th, 2010 - 4:30 pm

Our old friends the House of Saud are in the news again, this time not for funding terrorism aimed at a sky scraper near you but for breaking yet another agreement. See, in islam, it is OK to lie to the non believer, in fact it is encouraged in the march toward the Ummah. They agree to reform, and don’t, and we will never ever call them on it. If you would like to know what the House of Saud backed  Wahhabi world view has in mind for you, o infidel, read what they teach to their kids: via NRO

Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah will be received by President Obama in Washington today, nearly two years after the deadline by which the kingdom’s educational curriculum was to have been completely reformed. As the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom wrote to the president last week, “This promise remains unfulfilled.”

Saudi textbooks teach, along with many other noxious lessons, that Jews and Christians are “enemies,” and they dogmatically instruct that various groups of “unbelievers” — apostates (which includes Muslim moderates who reject Saudi Wahhabi doctrine), polytheists (which includes Shiites), and Jews — should be killed. Under the Saudi Education Ministry’s method of rote learning, these teachings amount to indoctrination, starting in first grade and continuing through high school, where militant jihad on behalf of “truth” is taught as a sacred duty. These textbooks are used not only in Saudi Arabia but in Saudi-funded schools around the world.

Levey stressed the primary importance of directing our policy at preventing people from embracing violent extremism in the first place. He warned, “Among other things, we must focus on educational reform in key locations to ensure that intolerance has no place in curricula and textbooks. . . . [U]nless the next generation of children is taught to reject violent extremism, we will forever be faced with the challenge of disrupting the next group of terrorist facilitators and supporters.”

The primary “key location” is undoubtedly Saudi Arabia. The kingdom is not just any country with problematic textbooks. As the controlling authority of the two holiest shrines of Islam, Saudi Arabia is able to disseminate its religious materials among the millions making the hajj to Mecca each year. Such teachings can, in this context, make a great impression. In addition, Saudi textbooks are also posted on the Saudi Education Ministry’s website and are shipped and distributed by a vast Sunni infrastructure established with Saudi oil wealth to Muslim communities throughout the world. In his book The Looming Tower, Lawrence Wright asserts that while Saudis constitute only 1 percent of the world’s Muslims, they pay “90 per cent of the expenses of the entire faith, overriding other traditions of Islam.

Please read the Rest here at NRO.

Video from NBC, of all places.

Excerpts from Saudi textbooks via Hudson Institute

Some background on our friends, the House of Saud and religion

► Hot Links

As Traditional Allies Refuse To Attend Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit, Widening Rifts Are Exposed

by WrathofG-d ( 107 Comments › )
Filed under American Supremacy, Nuclear Weapons at April 14th, 2010 - 2:00 pm

Much-to-do has been made of Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision not to attend the ‘nuclear security summit’ being held by President Obama.  (Israel sent an intelligence minister instead)  What has been remarkably under reported however is that Bibi is not the only  traditionally key U.S. ally not to be attending or feeling a coldness towards the United States as a result of President Obama’s repeated humiliation of America’s traditional allies.  Among others, Britain, Australia and Saudi Arabia also stayed home. (England is sending Foreign Secretary David Miliband).

Specifically, there is speculation that the refusal to attend by Great Britain’s Prime Minister (although they used the official excuse of needing time to campaign) is more evidence of a widening rift created by President Obama between the two traditional allies’ once special relationship.

I suspect there is far more to it than mere concern over missing a day or two on the election trail. This is almost certainly payback for Obama’s shoddy treatment of the Prime Minister during his previous two trips to the US. It is important not to underestimate the degree to which Brown was utterly humiliated when he went to the White House in March last year and was denied the courtesy of an official press conference or an official dinner with the president. To add insult to injury, Brown was made a laughingstock internationally when it was revealed the president had given him a derisive gift of 25 DVDs. In September, more embarrassment was to follow when Brown traveled to New York to attend the UN General Assembly, with President Obama declining to meet with his British counterpart after no less than five official requests.

There is certainly no love lost between the two leaders, and Brown’s decision to stay away from Washington has all the hallmarks of a significant transatlantic spat…

Although practically unreported, President Obama seems to be chasing our traditional allies away and realigning America with the totalitarian dictators of the world at a blistering pace. This destruction of traditional alliances however doesn’t only apply to Israel and Great Britain.

As remarkable as it is, the fact that neither British Prime Minister Gordon Brown nor Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are attending President Obama’s nuclear security summit in Washington Monday and Tuesday is not altogether surprising.

Relations with both countries — Israel in particular — have grown strained under Obama. Combined with Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s recent defiance of the administration, questions are growing about the president’s ability to maintain important relationships.

“It is a curious state of affairs when relations with our major democratic allies are all wobbly at once,” said Michael Green, a former foreign policy adviser to President George W. Bush, who also listed Japan and South Korea as traditional allies whose relationships with the U.S. have frayed under Obama.

The president’s critics, many of them from the Bush administration, say the summit absences — heads of state from Australia and Saudia Arabia also are not attending — are the most glaring examples of a floundering foreign policy that treats rivals and enemies better than friends.

“He seems to want to engage rivals, even enemies, more than spend time with friends and allies,” said David Kramer, a top State Department official in the Bush administration.

Elliot Abrams, another former top Bush administration foreign policy adviser, said the current White House was guilty of “diplomatic malpractice.”

“In his treatment of Karzai and Netanyahu, the president has shown an odd understanding of what it means to be a U.S. ally. Surely it should mean that inevitable disagreements are handled privately whenever possible. Surely it should mean avoiding steps that seek to weaken or humiliate a foreign leader,” Abrams said.

Though relations with Karzai grew strained at the end of the Bush administration, the Obama administration’s relationship with the Afghan president — the leader of the country that is currently home to the biggest concentration of U.S. military forces on the planet — has been a soap opera.

During Obama’s trip to Kabul just two weeks ago, he did not praise Karzai and his top officials made clear he was there to put pressure on the Afghan president to do a better job of governance and rooting out corruption.

Karzai responded by denouncing Western interference in last summer’s elections and by talking of joining the Taliban himself.

“Surely we should be treating [Karzai and Netanyahu] better than we treat enemies like [Syrian President] Bashar al-Asad or [Venezuelan President Hugo] Chavez, or the Russian and Chinese leaders, who if not enemies are certainly not friends,” Abrams said.

Even major European leaders got meetings with Obama this week only at the last minute. German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s one-on-one meeting with Obama was scheduled for Tuesday late on Sunday, only after meetings with the leaders of India, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Pakistan, Nigeria, China, Jordan, Malaysia, Ukraine, Armenia and Turkey.

► Hot Links

Saudis against Valentine’s day

by Rodan ( 123 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic hypocrisy at February 12th, 2010 - 12:00 pm

The beloved Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has now decided that Valentine’s Day is bad. They are banning any store from selling red items. The reason they are banning Valentine’s Day is because it’s a Christian Holiday!

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – The Saudi religious police launched Thursday a nationwide crackdown on stores selling items that are red or in any other way allude to the banned celebrations of Valentine’s Day, a Saudi official said.

Members of the feared religious police were inspecting shops for red roses, heart-shaped products or gifts wrapped in red, and ordering storeowners to get rid of them, the official said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to reporters.

Red-colored or heart-shaped items are legal at other times of the year, but as Feb. 14 nears they become contraband in Saudi Arabia. The kingdom bans celebration of Western holidays such as Valentine’s Day, named after a Christian saint said to have been martyred by the Romans in the 3rd Century.

Read the rest.

Islamic Tolerance, they ask for it here but show none in their homelands. This shows you how miserable this culture is and why me must be intolerant of them. It is time to remove the stench of Saudi influence from American politics. We don’t need them as “allies” or their oil. Screw Saudi Arabia they are an enemy and it’s time America realized it.

► Hot Links

Blogmocracy Dictionary Part 2: “Dialogue”

by Delectable ( 133 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, CAIR, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Progressives, Tranzis at November 25th, 2009 - 10:35 am

At an interfaith gathering in Nashville Tennassee, a Rabbi Falcon received a hug from the local Islamic Center.

Hug!

As mentioned before, a project I am undertaking with Blogmocracy is a dictionary. The goal of the dictionary is to show how words have been abused and desecrated, and then to reintroduce the words back into the English language.

This is a word that progressives love to bandy around: “dialogue.” And the New York Times is no exception. Check out this news story (hat tip – Debbie Schlussel):

They call themselves the “interfaith amigos.” And while they do sometimes seem more like a stand-up comedy team than a trio of clergymen, they know they have a serious burden in making a case for interfaith understanding in a country reeling after a Muslim Army officer at Fort Hood, Tex., was charged with opening fire on his fellow soldiers, killing 13.

“It arouses once again fear, distrust and doubt,” Sheik Rahman said, “and I know that when that happens, even the best of people cannot think clearly.” . . .

They began to meet weekly for spiritual direction, combining mutual support with theological reflection. Their families became acquainted over meals. They started an AM radio show, and they traveled together to Israel and the occupied territories. Recently, they wrote a book, “Getting to the Heart of Interfaith.”

At one point, the rabbi read a line the sheik had written about the security wall in Israel and announced, “If that line is in the book, I’m not in the book.” After vigorous discussion, Sheik Rahman rewrote the line in a way that both men felt was respectful of their principles.

But what exactly does it mean to “all get along”? Is it, as this article implies, simply a heavy dose of kumbaya?

CAIR has an office of “interfaith dialogue.” The Saudi king launched an “interfaith dialogue” in Madrid (Israelis were banned and Neturei Karta were allowed, of course). Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched an “interfaith dialogue” with Mennanites and Quakers.

On the other hand, Seeds of Peace has its own “dialogue” between Israelis and ‘Palestinians.’ Of course, its most famous graduates are Adam Shapiro and Huwaida Aarraf…who went on to form the Hamas-linked International Solidarity Movement.

The Pope launched his own “dialogue” as well, welcoming in numerous Islamic leaders.

And lastly and most importantly, we have our “dialogian in chief,” Barack Obama. He called for “dialogue” in his Cairo “speech to the Islamic world,” and is launching a fruitless “dialogue” with Iran.

Through it all, it appears this “dialogue” is one way. The actual definition of dialogue is to have a give and take – an exchange of ideas. There thus should be some sign – even if a small one – that both sides are willing to listen to what the other has to say.

This is dangerous in two respects: (a) What if the “other side” is an Islamist, and “listening to what they have to say” means listening to, and paying heed to, Islamist propaganda?; (b) What if the “other side” does not listen to what YOU have to say? At what point does it make sense to stop speaking?

Lest we forget, Muslim Mafia outlines how CAIR and other Islamist groups are actually using “dialogue” as a tool for their propaganda. To what extent did “dialogue” and discussions help stop Nazi Germany? And if that did not help, why is it always “evident” that talking is always useful?

It is apparent, based on what I have shown, that “dialogue” to the progressives has been defined as a tool to sit around and say kumbaya, while conceding the store. There is little to no background checks on these “dialogians,” and one such “chief dialogian” is Tariq Ramadan, an outright Islamist.

I urge Blogmocracy netizens to use the proper definition of “dialogue,” which is an open and frank discussion, including a give and take of ideas. “Dialogue” does not necessarily lead anywhere, and should not be seen as some holy grail, and an achievement in and of itself.

I myself have personally sat in on a “dialogue” session between Jews and Muslims, and I was disheartened by what I saw: it was essentially a “blame the Jew” session.

This term “dialogue” is neither good nor bad, as “dialogue” is not always warranted. It is time that world leaders become realistic about what “dialogue” actually means, and start to implement it only when it is warranted.

► Hot Links

Saudi Arabia Opens First Co-Ed University

by WrathofG-d ( 212 Comments › )
Filed under Religion, Saudi Arabia, Science, World at September 25th, 2009 - 2:11 pm

Although shocking….this is a great sign.

► Hot Links

Obama Increases Aid to Muslim Countries

by WrathofG-d ( 46 Comments › )
Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Egypt, Iran, Islamists, Israel, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Middle East, Nuclear Weapons, Palestinians, Saudi Arabia, World at June 30th, 2009 - 12:51 pm

Mr. “I don’t want to meddle in other Countries’ business (*if they are Muslim)” is upping U.S. aid to Islamic Dictatorships.  They deserve it right? I mean, they do so much for the U.S, and besides, it isn’t like we are in a recession.  Right?…..right?…..

_______________________________

Obama Bows To Saudi KingIn the latest in a recent series of increased American assistance efforts for Arab and Muslim states, U.S. President Barack Obama has allocated an additional $150 million to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The regimes leading Egypt, the Palestinian Authority, the United Arab Emirates and even Saudi Arabia have all benefited from recent American policy shifts.

Jordan’s Minister of Planning and International Cooperation, Suhair Al-Ali, was quoted by The Jordan Times as explaining that the [Jordanian] kingdom receives $363 million annually from the United States in economic assistance. The allocations signed into law by Obama this week mean that Jordan will receive a total of $513 million from the U.S. in 2009. The minister told the Jordanian newspaper that the additional American aid was the result of ongoing efforts by Jordan’s King Abdullah II, as well as Obama’s “recognition of the important role Jordan plays in the region.”

Egypt received $310 million in supplemental appropriations from the U.S. House of Representatives, currently controlled by Obama’s Democratic party. At the same time, 2009 State Department funding for the promotion of democratic initiatives in Egypt was cut from $50 million to $20 million. In addition, the U.S. has agreed not to give any of the pro-democracy funds to organizations that are not approved by the Mubarak regime. In the year 2007, Egypt received a total of $2.4 billion.

On another front, in March of this year, it was reported that the Obama administration planned to dramatically increase funding to the Palestinian Authority for security training, which is conducted by Jordanian police under the supervision of U.S. General Keith Dayton. The U.S. allocated $75 million for the PA police training in 2008, but reports indicated that the Obama administration was planning to pump up to $130 million into the program in 2009In.  In any event, the U.S. has already pledged $600 million in funds to the Palestinian Authority, with another $300 million for humanitarian aid to the Hamas regime in Gaza.

Elsewhere in the region, the U.S. is set to help the United Arab Emirates become the first Arab nation with a developed nuclear power infrastructure. President Obama gave his official support and authorization for the $41 billion project, allowing private U.S. companies to compete for construction contracts.

In Pakistan, the U.S. president proposed $2.8 billion in aid for that nation’s military, alongside civilian aid of $1.5 billion a year for the next five years. The military aid is ostensibly to allow the Pakistanis to more effectively fight jihadist and al-Qaeda terrorism emanating from the Swat Valley and along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

The Obama administration’s assistance to Arab and Muslim states extends beyond the monetary, however.

According to an article in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin earlier this month, the American government has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to preserve sovereign immunity for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and four Saudi princes in connection with a civil case seeking compensation for victims of the massive September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorist attacks on the American homeland. The claimants in the case say that there is sufficient evidence of Saudi involvement in 9/11 for the court to lift the normally applicable immunity.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal, told Newsweek magazine this month that the United States should cut off all aid to Israel if the Jewish State does not accept the 2002 Saudi-sponsored Arab-Israeli terms of negotiation.

{The Rest of The Article}

_______________________________

It is becoming more apparent daily that President Obama has a troubling affinity for Islamic Countries that he doesn’t maintain for other Democratic nations.

► Hot Links

Marriage ends for 8 Year old Saudi Bride

by Rodan ( 7 Comments › )
Filed under Islamic Supremacism, Multiculturalism, Sharia (Islamic Law) at April 30th, 2009 - 8:03 am

In some positive new, the marriage of an 8 year old girl and a man in his 50′s has been annulled. Ironically it was the girl’s mother that wanted the marriage to continue. They married off their daughter for money.

Young Saudi girl’s marriage ended

Media reports say an arranged marriage between a Saudi girl aged eight and a man in his 50s has been annulled, in a case attracting worldwide criticism
The Saudi Gazette says the divorce was agreed in an out-of-court settlement after a judge rejected two attempts to grant the girl a divorce.

The case prompted Saudi officials to say it would start regulating the marriages of young girls.

The only international outrage I heard was from the anti Jihad groups. I didn’t hear much from women’s and children’s rights groups. This is another example of how Islam isn’t compatible with Western Civilization. Why doe we allow these people in? This is Pedophilia pure and simple. The Leftists will say we need to be tolerant of this. I say no I am intolerant against Islam and I am proud of it!

► Hot Links

Saudi Cleric Teaches Jew-Hatred To Children On Al-Jazeera

by WrathofG-d ( 3 Comments › )
Filed under Anti-semitism, Hate Speech, Islamists, Israel, Judaism, Middle East, Religion, Saudi Arabia at March 27th, 2009 - 2:12 pm

Saudi Cleric Khaled Al-Khlewi gives a Jew-hating lesson to already brainwashed elementary school children, that would make a Neo-Nazi blush.  He starts with lessons from the Koran, and the time of Mohammad, covering every anti-Semitic fallacy and libel, up to Operation Cast Lead.  Is it just me or do lessons in Islam read like posts on a White Power(less) blog?

I guess some well intentioned infidel from the U.K., or San Francisco never informed this learned Islamic cleric that their hatred of Jews has nothing to do with Islam, Mohammad’s teachings, or the Koran, and that it is only about the “Israeli ‘occupation”.  I wonder if he will be getting a harshly worded letter from C.A.I.R.?

All joking aside, the most frightening part of this video is the fact of how well versed in anti-Semitism, sexism, and hatred these exceptionally young children already are.   Even if some sort of peace is created between Islamists and the West today, it will do nothing to stop these children when they grow up.

*

► Hot Links

The Joys Of Sharia!

by WrathofG-d ( 16 Comments › )
Filed under Islamists, Religion, Sharia (Islamic Law) at February 9th, 2009 - 5:59 pm

Saudi Arabia:  47 Year Old Man Marries 8 Year Old Girl Against Her Mother’s Will

________________________________________________________________________________

Just in case your Western sensibilities caused you to foolishly “know” that this must have been a fluke, a miscarriage of justice in Saudi Arabia, or an obvious sin against “the perfect Religion of Peace”, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia’s highest authority, gave his religious opinion.

_____________________________________________________

Top Saudi cleric: OK for young girls to wed


(CNN)
— The debate over the controversial practice of child marriage in Saudi Arabia was pushed back into the spotlight this week, with the kingdom’s top cleric saying that it’s OK for girls as young as 10 to wed.

“It is incorrect to say that it’s not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger,” Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Sheikh, the kingdom’s grand mufti, said in remarks quoted Wednesday in the regional Al-Hayat newspaper. “A girl aged 10 or 12 can be married. Those who think she’s too young are wrong and they are being unfair to her.”

The judge, Sheikh Habib Abdallah al-Habib, rejected a petition from the girl’s mother, whose lawyer said the marriage was arranged by her father to settle a debt with “a close friend.” The judge required the girl’s husband to sign a pledge that he would not have sex with her until she reaches puberty.

Al-Sheikh was asked during a Monday lecture about parents forcing their underage daughters to marry.

“We hear a lot in the media about the marriage of underage girls,” he said, according to the newspaper. “We should know that Shariah law has not brought injustice to women.”

Christoph Wilcke, a Saudi Arabia researcher for Human Rights Watch, recently told CNN that his organization has heard many other cases of child marriages.”

________________________________________________________________________________

► Hot Links

Bill Clinton’s Islamic ties

by Rodan ( 12 Comments › )
Filed under Democratic Party at December 18th, 2008 - 2:56 pm

Bill Clinton who in my opinion was just as bad as BushI and II is well known for giving China Military Technology. His polices that encouraged Free Trade and Globalization set the stage for the collapse of the American Middle Class. His policies of backstabbing nations like Israel and Serbia to help Islamic causes set the stage for 9/11. It seems now he has been rewarded by the Islamo-Fascists for his war against the Serbs.

Saudis, Blackwater among Clinton foundation donors

WASHINGTON — Former President Bill Clinton laid out a list of big-ticket donors to his foundation Thursday that is heavy with foreign governments and business interests sure to have a stake in the policies that Hillary Rodham Clinton carries out as secretary of state.

Saudi Arabia and other foreign governments gave at least $46 million, while corporate donors included the Blackwater security firm that protects U.S. diplomats in Iraq.

Bill Clinton turned America is a Judas nation. he attacked a traditional ally Serbia at the behest of Jihadists. He forced Israel to abandon Lebanon and allow Hizbollah to take over. He also made Israel give up land to teh arabs that  set the stage for the rise of Hamas. he also did nothing about Bin Laden. This is his reward for a job well done.

I wonder what the Islamisst will give Bush?

► Hot Links

Our Friends the Saudis – The Big Push to Criminalize Blasphemy

by Rodan ( 2 Comments › )
Filed under Free Speech, Islamists, Saudi Arabia, United Nations at November 13th, 2008 - 3:00 pm

At a special session of the United Nations General Assembly, the leader of the religious apartheid kingdom of Saudi Arabia will sit down in the same room with an Israeli for the first time. What would bring Abdullah to do this, an act that must be repugnant to him? Answer: the possibility that he may be able to talk the gullible infidels into criminalizing blasphemy.

WASHINGTON – World leaders gathering at the United Nations this week for a special session of the General Assembly to advance interfaith dialogue should have no illusions that their efforts will miraculously promote mutual respect between religious communities or end abuses of religious freedom.

Saudi King Abdullah, who initiated this week’s special session, is quietly enlisting the leaders’ support for a global law to punish blasphemy – a campaign championed by the 56-member Organization of Islamic Conference that puts the rights of religions ahead of individual liberties.

If the campaign succeeds, states that presume to speak in the name of religion will be able to crush religious freedom not only in their own country, but abroad.

The UN session is designed to endorse a meeting of religious leaders in Spain last summer that was the brainchild of King Abdullah and organized by the Muslim World League. That meeting resulted in a final statement counseling promotion of “respect for religions, their places of worship, and their symbols … therefore preventing the derision of what people consider sacred.”

The lofty-sounding principle is, in fact, a cleverly coded way of granting religious leaders the right to criminalize speech and activities that they deem to insult religion. Instead of promoting harmony, however, this effort will exacerbate divisions and intensify religious repression.

This isn’t a low-level campaign; it will be attended by world leaders, and some of them have already signaled their acquiescence to the agenda: The Big Saudi Swindle.

(Hat tip: Soccer Dad and Nancy.)

► Hot Links

Treasury Considering Islamic Finance?

by Rodan ( 6 Comments › )
Filed under Economy, Islamic Finance at November 6th, 2008 - 11:10 am

Frank Gaffney says the US Treasury, as part of its effort to deal with the banking crisis, is preparing to submit to Shariah.

As reported in this space last week, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Robert Kimmitt set the stage with his recent visit to Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich Persian Gulf states. His stated purpose was to promote the recycling of petrodollars in the form of foreign investment here.

Evidently, the price demanded by his hosts is that the U.S. government get with the Islamist financial program. While in Riyadh, Mr. Kimmitt announced: “The U.S. government is currently studying the salient features of Islamic banking to ascertain how far it could be useful in fighting the ongoing world economic crisis.”

“Islamic banking” is a euphemism for a practice better known as “Shariah-Compliant Finance (SFC).” And it turns out that this week the Treasury will be taking officials from various federal agencies literally to school on SFC.

The department is hosting a half-day course entitled “Islamic Finance 101” on Thursday at its headquarters building. Treasury’s self-described “seminar for the policy community” is co-sponsored with the leading academic promoters of Shariah and SCF in the United States: Harvard University Law School’s Project on Islamic Finance. At the very least, the U.S. government evidently hopes to emulate Harvard’s success in securing immense amounts of Wahhabi money in exchange for conforming to the Islamists’ agenda. Like Harvard, Treasury seems utterly disinterested in what Shariah actually is, and portends

(Hat tip: Obama supporter:Charles Johnson)

► Hot Links

Saudi Clerics Issuing Death Fatwas for TV Producers

by Rodan Comments Off
Filed under Islamists, Media, Saudi Arabia at September 16th, 2008 - 10:24 am

Saudi clerics are raging and seething about the Turkish soap operas (dubbed into Arabic) that are becoming very popular in the religious apartheid kingdom, and calling for people to be killed.

“If they continue airing depravity and shamelessness they should be banished from this place and others brought in their place,” senior Saudi cleric Sheikh Saleh al-Fozan said in comments published Sunday, referring to TV executives.

He suggested purveyors of horoscopes and “sorcery” should face the death penalty, and head of the Islamic sharia courts Sheikh Saleh al-Lohaidan said last week channel owners should be tried and face possible death for “indecency and vulgarity.”

Arab TV producers aren’t laughing.

They’re not laughing because they know these aren’t idle threats. But there’s an interesting note of hope in this story:

One TV official who did not want to be named said religious conservatives could not push back the tide in Arab entertainment television, which already pays attention to social and religious mores. “You can’t put the consumer back in the box,” he said.

Statistics compiled for MBC indicate that one episode of Turkish soap “Noor” reached an audience of 85 million, half of whom were women, in early August. There are around 300 million Arabic-speakers throughout the Middle East and North Africa.

Long live the idiot box!

(Hat tip:Nancy@LGF)

► Hot Links

CAIR Seething Over References to ‘Islamic Terrorism’ at GOP Convention

by Rodan ( 16 Comments › )
Filed under Election 2008, Islamists, Republican Party, Terrorism at September 4th, 2008 - 9:30 am

The Saudi-funded, Hamas-linked Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) is seething over the references to “Islamic terrorism” in last night’s speeches: U.S. Muslims Urge McCain, Palin to Offer ‘Inclusive’ Speeches.

In a statement, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad said:

“We urge Senator McCain and Governor Palin to offer inclusive speeches at this week’s Republican convention and ask that they both avoid divisive Islamophobic rhetoric. It is all too easy to use hot-button terms to garner votes, but true leaders do not exploit fear or stereotypes for political gain. We hope to hear Senator McCain and Governor Palin say they will defend the civil and religious rights of all Americans, work with the American Muslim community in making our nation both free and secure and help build better relations with the Islamic world.”

He suggested that McCain and Palin reflect the Republican Party Platform, which states: “The struggle in which we are engaged is ideological, not ethnic or religious. The extremists we face are abusers of faith, not its champions. We appreciate the loyalty of all Americans whose family roots lie in the Middle East, and we gratefully acknowledge the contributions of American Arabs and Muslims, especially those in the Armed Forces and the intelligence community.”

Awad added that Muslims have called on candidates of all political parties to reject Islamophobia and believe using phrases such as “Islamic terrorism” may unintentionally provide religious legitimacy to terrorists.

Coming from the leader of a group that is listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas funding trial, this is shameless. But it’s what CAIR does.

Interestingly, this paid press release doesn’t come through CAIR’s usual outlet, PRNewsWire, but through Market Wire. That’s why it shows up in Yahoo’s “Finance” section. Did PRNewsWire finally pull the plug on CAIR’s deceptive propaganda?

(Hat tip:Chuckie the LGF Cult Leader)

► Hot Links

CAIR Demands Correction from Steve Emerson

by Rodan ( 13 Comments › )
Filed under Dhimmitude, Islamists, Political Correctness, Terrorism at August 15th, 2008 - 10:18 pm

There’s an interesting (and revealing) exchange between the Investigative Project for Terrorism’s Steven Emerson and CAIR’s Corey Saylor, in the comments (scroll down) for this article at the IPT site: Emerson Exposes Radical Ties of State Department Outreach Partners.

(Hat Tip: Charles the Fake)

► Hot Links